Project Reality Forums

Waaah_Wah wrote:Would suck if the old Archer gets buried in a box before this one is done

Well time is the biggest factor for me... The original Archer took 15 days to lightmap (mostly due to complex statics) This one may take less time (new PC and simple statics)

I started shaking of joy when I read the title, THANK YOU!

I've always loved Operation Archer, too bad there's almost no servers running it (atleast when I'm playing.) Hopefully this will make it more popular.

Great work

A good map, getting even better...

Great to see a brilliant map getting even more so

Rock on Dude! I think the community will be happy.

Great job!

Looks awesome, hope the view distance wasn't lowered though.

insurgents have always done pretty ok on this map when i've played it, even though mid- and close range engagements are what they prefer.

looking forward to it!

Feenan. wrote:Looks awesome, hope the view distance wasn't lowered though.

go big or go home are my thoughts

[R-DEV]PARAMEDIC.CA wrote:go big or go home are my thoughts

That's what she said....






But please transfer all of this to every map concerning view distances

Scot wrote:That's what she said....






But please transfer all of this to every map concerning view distances

hmmm..... each mapper has their own preferences and restrictions

Muttrah fort on top of an Afghan hill?

[R-COM]Outlawz wrote:Muttrah fort on top of an Afghan hill?

enjoy

I'm super pumped about this. I always thought Archer had a lot of hidden potential.

looks great! operation archer is just awesome, but this looks even better!

woot Archer thats epic m8 looking forward to it

And also what's the actual size? These guys seem confused. ˇˇ

[quote=""'[R-COM"]J.F.Leusch69;866888']

so is it 4x4km or 2x2km or even a 4x2km map?[/quote]

[quote="Waaah_Wah""]its 4km^2[/quote]

Size: 4km2

Can we agree to use the BF2 mapping language code which is:

size/scale 1 2 4
256
512
1024