Project Reality Forums

the brits are thy biggest queenfudgers known to man.. (Joke)

i support the g3 v ak47 idea, and with the upcoming patch with all the good-looking well-tasting sexyfilled patch, insurgenzy might have the same, but different effect on my fun-producing cortex.-

single.shot (nor) wrote: i support the g3 v ak47 idea,

Norwegians ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by single.shot (nor) View Post
i support the g3 v ak47 idea,
Norwegians ?

MEC...

sakils2 wrote:

MEC...

what im saying is why put MEC on basrah when you can just wait till Norwegians come in and then pwn all the INS you want with G3's

gazzthompson wrote:Norwegians ?

They will be using the HK 416 wont they?

Waaah_Wah wrote:They will be using the HK 416 wont they?

dunno, hope not

gazzthompson wrote:dunno, hope not

AFAIK, they will use The 416 since Norwegians are currently replacing the AG3 with it.

Maybe they will use both though..

It's not the rifle that matters.

What matters is that Basrah is a very good opportunity to have a MEC vs. Insurgent map that finally puts the Brits and Yankees where they belong in PR: Afghanistan, Eastern Europe, China, and a few other places.

MEC in iraq ?? come on.... brits pull out , iraq army say no wai !!!!!!!!!!! come help us !!?!?!? brits come back. /thread

gazzthompson wrote:MEC in iraq ?? come on.... brits pull out , iraq army say no wai !!!!!!!!!!! come help us !!?!?!? brits come back. /thread

Tbh, it makes more sence to have MEC vs ins in Basrah than Brits given the current PR scenario.

Think about it yourself, what would Brits be doing in Basrah if MEC and the allied were in a big war?

I think insurgent get G3 next version, so that will be fun with no kevlar

There's no story in PR, I know, but I could easily imagine the Republic of Iraq becoming a part of the MEC and the Coalition funding an insurgency among the radical Islamic residents.

That even brings an explanation for the insurgent G3: to prevent the MEC from sweeping through Turkey or w/e, NATO is unwilling to flood the insurgency with its own weapons, and instead ships captured G3s to the insurgents.

So, it works either way.

Hotrod525 wrote:you can wrote IRAQ and IRAK. Its the same. Iraq is english, Irak is French.

thats me told. my applogies, im that used to idiots spelling how they text i didnt think of other languages

Waaah_Wah wrote:Tbh, it makes more sence to have MEC vs ins in Basrah than Brits given the current PR scenario.

Think about it yourself, what would Brits be doing in Basrah if MEC and the allied were in a big war?

Who says the insurgent maps are part of the same NATO vs. MEC/China/Russia war?

And just for argument's sake, if Iraq stayed allied with the US, they may be using the area as a staging ground to attack the MEC, and the MEC is funding insurgents to cause havoc.