Battlefield 3

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
unrealalex
Posts: 1595
Joined: 2007-07-29 21:51

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by unrealalex »

I'm still waiting on Battlefield Heroes, I look forward to dominating with planes like the good ol' days of BF2 plane whoring.
=Romagnolo=
Posts: 4765
Joined: 2006-12-29 14:52

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by =Romagnolo= »

FAKE and OLD
[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto:"Cheers, you're the man, Okita"
[R-DEV]Rhino:"I in fact got kicked from a server for tking."
Hitperson:"well done, treasure it forever."
[R-DEV]Adriaan:"Damned classy Roma, if I may say so."
[R-DEV]Chuc:"Pro man, pro."
(yes, it was about me)
[R-MOD]BloodBane611:"Romagnolo, you definitely deserve a LOL award for that."
Shotgun
Posts: 97
Joined: 2008-01-21 07:26

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Shotgun »

btw all the "rumors" about BF3 state that there is 40 players per team
PR BigD for life

Home of the Australian and New Zealand PR Community

http://www.bigdgaming.net

Image
shifty66
Posts: 309
Joined: 2008-09-06 01:40

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by shifty66 »

i dont know, bigger and better things though ey.
Image[/img]
*14 sigs made for PR members Ingame name:supermannen6 Not making sigs anymore. Army life does not permit it! hah
mp5punk
Posts: 1219
Joined: 2008-07-03 22:18

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by mp5punk »

im just curios why they cant just tell the people, ya we have it or no we Don't. Its that simple
Image
Cobhris
Posts: 576
Joined: 2008-06-11 07:14

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Cobhris »

PlaynCool wrote:If if this is true and we can have only 40 ppl online this would kill current pr gameplay.
It said "PER TEAM". That means 80 people online.
PlatinumA1
Posts: 381
Joined: 2007-06-25 07:31

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by PlatinumA1 »

mp5punk wrote:im just curios why they cant just tell the people, ya we have it or no we Don't. Its that simple
i'm pretty sure ea is busy worrying about other games in the works than another bf
shifty66
Posts: 309
Joined: 2008-09-06 01:40

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by shifty66 »

Just reading through the original link.

So really its BF2 but with more players but less teams, less maps and same features?

Hmm.
Image[/img]
*14 sigs made for PR members Ingame name:supermannen6 Not making sigs anymore. Army life does not permit it! hah
Tirak
Posts: 2022
Joined: 2008-05-11 00:35

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Tirak »

I wouldn't trust anything on the site, big things that jumped out at me were "Possible public beta in “Summer 2008"″ and "Release in late 2008", since 2008 ends in approx 6 days, I think we can safely say the info is more than a little suspect.
Water_Is_Poison18
Posts: 86
Joined: 2007-08-05 15:27

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Water_Is_Poison18 »

Tirak wrote:I wouldn't trust anything on the site, big things that jumped out at me were "Possible public beta in “Summer 2008"″ and "Release in late 2008", since 2008 ends in approx 6 days, I think we can safely say the info is more than a little suspect.
Looking at the info, apart from the "modern environment", it all seems to match up with Battlefield Heroes. They kept saying public beta in summer '08 and release end of '08 for a long time. Same with the "MMO feel". So yeah, the link seems to be referring to Heroes, not a true BF3.
Image
mp5punk
Posts: 1219
Joined: 2008-07-03 22:18

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by mp5punk »

well, then EA needs to put the rumors down by saying they have it or they dont have it.
Image
Oldirti
Posts: 310
Joined: 2007-08-06 14:37

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by Oldirti »

EA profits from speculation, why would they get rid of the hype that they don't even have to pay for, regardless of whether there is a game in development or not.
Image
shifty66
Posts: 309
Joined: 2008-09-06 01:40

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by shifty66 »

Funny enough were doing exactly what they want :lol:

merry Christmas i suppose... ;-)
Image[/img]
*14 sigs made for PR members Ingame name:supermannen6 Not making sigs anymore. Army life does not permit it! hah
PFunk
Posts: 1072
Joined: 2008-03-31 00:09

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by PFunk »

Here's a question. If not BF3 what would the next gen Project Reality platform be? Maybe in a few years when everyone has a better computer they can take a stab at the Cry Engine.
[PR]NATO|P*Funk
Image
Image
PRC_Heavy_Z
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1088
Joined: 2007-02-25 22:56

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by PRC_Heavy_Z »

The problem with the cry engine is its limited player size, having only half of BF2's 64 player-size...
RedAlertSF
Posts: 877
Joined: 2008-10-07 14:21

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by RedAlertSF »

If BF3 has 80 players, 1.5 patch for BF2 will never give us more players..
master of the templars
Posts: 598
Joined: 2007-06-26 21:37

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by master of the templars »

The "leaked" info seems pretty fake in my opinion.
Make nukes, Not war
cyberzomby
Posts: 5336
Joined: 2007-04-03 07:12

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by cyberzomby »

[R-DEV]bosco wrote:Nobody knows except EA.
Well even EA knows nothing about it or its not coming in 2009 yet.
LeChuckle
Posts: 664
Joined: 2007-02-09 13:53

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by LeChuckle »

"yeah, the battlefield franchise has been a total failure, lets come up with something else"?
GreedoNeverShot
Posts: 213
Joined: 2008-06-16 20:48

Re: Battlefield 3

Post by GreedoNeverShot »

Looking at the info, apart from the "modern environment", it all seems to match up with Battlefield Heroes.
Yeah, especially the "MEC" and "NATO" factions...
"If you outlaw guns, only Outlaws will have guns."
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”