Page 2 of 3

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-17 19:07
by Polka
Besides failure, this shows the build number which then shows how close we may be to a release har har

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-17 19:19
by hiberNative
would be more fun if each changelog was coded in different ways. like binary, and then ancient maya etc

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-17 19:34
by chimpyang
If they get to 9, then would the next one be 0.9? :P

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-17 19:35
by Nibbit
post more stuff like this plz, very usefull

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-17 20:02
by charliegrs
i didnt mind these encrypted changelogs so much when you could get atleast a little bit of info out of it if you did some work. now that you only get like 1 letter to work with i think im gonna go bang my head into the wall.

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-17 20:16
by single.shot (nor)
this smells 0.85, lovely to each centimetre....

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-17 20:19
by TayloR016
Looks like its becoming more of a full realease than a patch.. unless that was the intention :P , well at least these lists are getting shorter

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-17 20:44
by torenico
yay!! they fixed something on the HA-T

WEAPONS: Fixed pxxxxxxxxx mxxxxxxx ox Rxx Txxxxx wxxxxxx.xSxxxxx dx txx sxxx dxxxxx ax oxxxx H-AT pxxxxxxxxxx nxx.

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-17 21:03
by Simmage
Not another one of these :D

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-17 22:11
by Eagle345
:28_behead

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-17 22:35
by Cptkanito
no. 5? oh dear i don't like these :(

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-17 22:45
by ghOst819
:28_behead

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-17 23:01
by Proff3ssorXman
Gah, again.

I betcha it'll be released the day I go back to boarding school....

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-18 00:00
by 99lynx
It has to be released soon

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-18 00:04
by badmojo420
PYTHON: Updated TK pxxxxxxxx to cxxxxxxx punish fxxxxxxxx ox pxxxxxxxx.xAxxx every time you TK two players dxxxxx oxx lxxx cxxxx,xyxxx score is zeroed. (dbzao)

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-18 00:30
by fuzzhead
I just have a questions to the devs if they are willing to answer it. Did you guys think you were gonna have .85 out by now? Did you add more content than previously thought, or ran into problems? Im not complaining about how long its taking, im just curious.
More content than previously thought? yes.

Ran in problems? DOUBLE YES.

This is much more than a patch, its definitely closer to a full build in terms of new content, maps, new features, etc. but we are retaining the v0.85 naming convention because its too late to change it now, and it gives us some breathing space before the big 1.0

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-18 00:37
by Blakeman
[R-DEV]fuzzhead wrote:More content than previously thought? yes.

Ran in problems? DOUBLE YES.

This is much more than a patch, its definitely closer to a full build in terms of new content, maps, new features, etc. but we are retaining the v0.85 naming convention because its too late to change it now, and it gives us some breathing space before the big 1.0
I had been wondering that as well as if you fine PR devs were trying to wait until after the BF2 patch from EA to release .85

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-18 00:48
by fuzzhead
If we did that, we would undoubtedly be waiting a long long time (possibly forever)

Image

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-18 00:49
by shifty66
Oh lawd, this is going to be great.

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.855 fifth test build

Posted: 2009-01-18 00:57
by orlandolukas
'[R-DEV wrote:fuzzhead;905259']If we did that, we would undoubtedly be waiting a long long time (possibly forever)

Image
i started laughing then i started chocking.