Project Reality Forums

[R-DEV]bosco wrote:I agree that the rifles should be less accurate on great ranges, I had a squadmember shoot a sniper on the Muttrah hotel with his G3 from 502m away.

Regular G3 w/ scope?

Assuming he was prone, settled for 5 seconds and pacing his shots in 1 second intervals, his shots would deviate from where he was aiming by 78cm. Also factor that there's significant bullet drop @ 500m....

[R-DEV]Jaymz wrote:Regular G3 w/ scope?

Assuming he was prone, settled for 5 seconds and pacing his shots in 1 second intervals, his shots would deviate from where he was aiming by 78cm. Also factor that there's significant bullet drop @ 500m....

Normal scoped G3 (even while standing IIRC) It was Spaz, and Leadmagnet is my witness.

From the contruction site straight into a guy laying on the hotel roof.

Well, that's not really fair is it, I mean it was Spaz shooting the rifle, everyone knows he can insta-headshot anything, from any range

[R-DEV]bosco wrote:(even while standing IIRC)

Meaning his rounds would have been deviating 65cm from his point of aim if the target was 500m away like you said. Hack much Spaz?

[R-DEV]Jaymz wrote:Meaning his rounds would have been deviating 65cm from his point of aim if the target was 500m away like you said. Hack much Spaz?

Oh busted lol (-;

But the G3A3 scope is very good the small thin triangle at long range the tip of the triangle is not bigger then the players head at 500+ meters

I can has ballistics? *nudges crasyasian*

Hey Zangoo did all the work I just found some weapon information but I will try and figure out how he did that stuff.

I agree about ballistics.

*pokes crazy*

ReaperMAC wrote:Is that with people shooting at them? Or at a rifle range where all they are trying to do is to qualify for expert marksman every year?

Well, it would be harder for people to hit you like that if you shot at them on sight to throw of their aim. It gets significantly harder to shoot when bullets are landing 13 inches from your soldier's face.

Cobhris wrote:Well, it would be harder for people to hit you like that if you shot at them on sight to throw of their aim. It gets significantly harder to shoot when bullets are landing 13 inches from your soldier's face.

Yes, the whole "so-and-so has been trained to hit so-and-so meters" doesn't really help if he's getting suppressed and the like. Though, it does seem to be easier to take out whole squads by yourself these days.

crazyasian11 wrote:Hey Zangoo did all the work I just found some weapon information but I will try and figure out how he did that stuff.

I thought he passed on that project to you, sent you the files and everything!

I have all the files, I just dont know what to do to make it better.

ReaperMAC wrote:Yes, the whole "so-and-so has been trained to hit so-and-so meters" doesn't really help if he's getting suppressed and the like. Though, it does seem to be easier to take out whole squads by yourself these days.

It's only easier if they don't see you first. I can probably take down 2 guys alone with my assault rifle if I attack from behind, and the third will probably kill me before I can get him.

If you're in a regular fight, it's all about who has better suppression and better aim.

Cobhris wrote:It's only easier if they don't see you first. I can probably take down 2 guys alone with my assault rifle if I attack from behind, and the third will probably kill me before I can get him.

I guess I've had better luck than you then