Page 2 of 9

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-27 19:22
by nicoX
127-8 Players vs Devs :D .

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-27 20:09
by Alex6714
Well this is a decisive poll.

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-27 20:54
by xXRich07Xx
Lt Mic wrote:NO too much "vanilla"!(BF2)!!
even M9 or other pistol(headshot only) should kill no revive... Reality is reality....
sniper rifles especialy....
YES!

By making people revivable even after a headshot, the devs have almost made the sniper useless.

The sniper's function is to recon and take out valuable targets.

Back in the day Headshotting an enemy squad's officer was worth something. Now, it's useless.

Nothing is more frustrating than to pull off a perfect shot at 600m only to have the guy revived.

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-27 22:41
by Harrod200
/vote yes

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-28 02:48
by Cassius
This is the most onesided ballot since pedomonster souldevourer ran against mr awesomeniceguy. If we were in Russia or a muslim country we would be accused of having rigged the vote.

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-28 04:44
by master of the templars
Cassius wrote:This is the most onesided ballot since pedomonster souldevourer ran against mr awesomeniceguy. If we were in Russia or a muslim country we would be accused of having rigged the vote.
lol :grin: at least no one is arguing.

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-28 05:09
by Sadist_Cain
Last time I checked field medics werent trained in brain surgery.

Though I may be wrong

Have to say if there are any Devs pushing for headshots to not kill (which I would find surprising) then you have to ask yourself why work on Project Reality :S

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-28 05:22
by Rudd
imo headshots should returned from realism's sake

but there is alot that should be in PR for realism's sake.

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-28 05:27
by -Sauso-
obviously i voted yes, but i am not going to stop playing like some people have bitched about and done...

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-28 11:12
by Rico
The PR community hath spoken! :)

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-28 11:26
by Truism
A better poll would be "Should the devs release a hotfix for headshots not being instant kills, or not?"

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-28 14:36
by Lowjoe
Rico wrote:The PR community hath spoken! :)
with 95% yes-votes ö.ö

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-28 14:46
by TheParadoX
YES YES and YES ! I don't see how headshot = instant death is not realisitic. Seriously guys, this game has turned into Project: Revive !

Even a smaller fix would change the game, affecting it in a very meaningful way: Promoting teamwork, less rambo-actions ...

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-28 15:08
by hall0
Truism wrote:A better poll would be "Should the devs release a hotfix for headshots not being instant kills, or not?"
:D

This would be great.

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-02-28 20:34
by [Fr]WhiteMoon
I don't see any possibility in a realistic way for the epipen to be able to instantly restructure a partly destroyed head leading to the ability for the soldier to come back on the battlefield.

But if you're hit by a knife in the foot, no way to revive the soldier ! :lol:

Anyway, this mod remains great.

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-03-01 03:20
by Cassius
amazing_retard wrote:tbh with all the medic whoring and revive spam that is going on, I started to think twice before playing insurgents. I kill a guy and a minute later a medic revives the body after running across the whole map TO GET THAT ONE GUY.
So really head shots should kill, and in IRL there is little a medic can do to treat a gunshot wound to the head....
Toss a cocktail on the body, fix.

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-03-01 09:19
by TurnCoat
'[Fr wrote:WhiteMoon;948582']But if you're hit by a knife in the foot, no way to revive the soldier ! :lol:
I do not see anything funny. BF2 engine has not an advanced differentiated damage system. The knife is very deadly weapon. A knife in the foot? What about femoral artery? You have no chance to survive in the real battlefield under circumstances when the enemy decided to kill you with a knife.
Voted "yes", no alternative.

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-03-01 10:52
by [Fr]WhiteMoon
IRL a soldier will heavily hurt an ennemy with the knife, but it can also be not fatal, especially in a hurry, and if a medic come quickly take care of him. That's not a big deal in my opinion, but if a headshot can be mortal, it should be this way.

Re: Should the Head shots kill ?

Posted: 2009-03-01 11:41
by TurnCoat
If the enemy decided to kill you with a knife no hurry is no longer, it is fatal