Project Reality Forums

In this ingame video (no fancy trailer editing) you can see the better ragdoll and helmet/weapon flying... there are still the sounds for helmet dropping in the game files.

Wow, the ingame physics in the video above really are superior to those of the finished game. Really; why is that?

And can't this be considered some kind of false or misleading advertising?

The stuff in the video seem to be real in-game stuff, no editing at all. I doubt they'd go as far as editing a full 3D animation to make it look like that.

This is one of the little things that could make the game feel much more immersive and refined.

If it wasnt incoportated in the main Bf2 release there must have been something wrong with it

Its a beta version of bf2

Does someone know if sombody have taken the time to actually test and adjust the ragdoll-values to make it look more realistic, and posted it on the boards? link?

Redamare wrote:If it wasnt incoportated in the main Bf2 release there must have been something wrong with it

Most likely just for optimizing purposes for those minimum requirement Pentium 4 1,7ghz processors.

EA really suck balls lol, they take out good stuff and refuse to let us have other good stuff...!Gskjgnsfkgn

Dr2B Rudd wrote:EA really suck balls lol, they take out good stuff and refuse to let us have other good stuff...!Gskjgnsfkgn

I like how everyone blames EA but Dice made it. Its like calling someones mom a ***** because you don't like her son.

What you mean to say is Dice sucks balls

Incomplete Spork wrote:I like how everyone blames EA but Dice made it. Its like calling someones mom a ***** because you don't like her son.

What you mean to say is Dice sucks balls

Well no. DICE made an alright game, but EA made them take a lot of stuff out (that wasn't finished yet, or EA didn't want it in) AND released it too early. There's just so much stuff that didn't make it into the game that I think could have, if they postponed its release.

Some examples:
- Ragdoll animations
- Dropkits (weapons falling, helmet, etc.)
- Fastroping (and thus a decent implementation of rotor blades collision)
- Tank HUDs (the original were different (better) than vanilla)
- Vehicle on vehicle collisions (should have been checked out)
- Etc...

Well EA suck balls anyway for raping the CnC franchise instead of letting Westwood get on with it...

but yes, DICE suck balls too, but we can forgive them because EA control them.

dont get ure pantys in a twist we dont want to hear the ramblings of a drunken madman

Imho 1.0 was allright, patches messed all up which were done by Canadians

So... is this idea now completely scrapped or will we see this in next releases?

yeah Devs, you should look into ragdoll settings

I need mah fastropes how i need to do my L33T roof operations without fastropes devs maybe u can add invisible ladder

WilsonPL wrote:yeah Devs, you should look into ragdoll settings

they are afaik, it was mentioned a while ago and got a DEV response.

I need mah fastropes how i need to do my L33T roof operations without fastropes devs maybe u can add invisible ladder

goddamit, that video made me laugh out loud at work and made everyone look at me

omg he's right

does anyone know if these trailers are like for the console versions?

do they happen in consoles?