Extraction mode thoughts and tips

perectshot69 · Post by **perectshot69** » 2006-05-15 00:32

i acutally own a suburban and i drive it every where it seats 8 people i think there should be a vip guy and at least have 2 or 3 more seats that can shoot out the window or mount a machine gun on top

trogdor1289 · Post by **trogdor1289** » 2006-05-15 00:44

This is a realism mod in real life the windows are shut otherwise the bullet proofing would be useless and a real life suburbuan doesn't have a MG mounted on top even in Iraq. The humvees running protection provide that for them.

perectshot69 · Post by **perectshot69** » 2006-05-15 01:36

good point ye i never thought of that but thanks for answerin me and u didnt answer the extra seats like u could fit 4 people in it easily

mavit · Post by **mavit** » 2006-05-15 18:48

what would be the point in having 8 people in an SUV thats just gonna role over some c4 and be blown to buggerey? the guys should just jump in one of the accompanying humvees

Malik · Post by **Malik** » 2006-05-15 19:29

Exactly, there's not much point wasting time putting people in the SUV when they can't or don't need to do anything. The passenger's fair enough, it gives the vehicle a backup in the unlikely event something odd happens to the driver, and I rode in the passenger as Commander the other day, it's very luxurious. The best was when I got out, repaired the bridge and got back in again, then the SUV driver managed to plummet is right into the gap in the bridge.

mavit · Post by **mavit** » 2006-05-15 19:59

was it just me or didnt that last bit make sense? you repaired the bridge then fell into the hole ?

trogdor1289 · Post by **trogdor1289** » 2006-05-15 20:07

Malik wrote:Exactly, there's not much point wasting time putting people in the SUV when they can't or don't need to do anything. The passenger's fair enough, it gives the vehicle a backup in the unlikely event something odd happens to the driver, and I rode in the passenger as Commander the other day, it's very luxurious. The best was when I got out, repaired the bridge and got back in again, then the SUV driver managed to plummet is right into the gap in the bridge.

Yeah this really doesn't make any sense.

Malik · Post by **Malik** » 2006-05-15 20:22

Strike at Karkand 2. The north bridge with the ramp. I fixed the bridge, but we didn't make the jump and fell in. Sorry, I should've made that more clear.

TII · Post by **TII** » 2006-05-15 22:13

I'd like to see a 5ton tuck added which could haul 2 squads and have the seating placement where the soldiers in back could fire out. Once in a firefight the troops assigned to the transport could hop out and secure the area on foot and have some cover if under fire, and after the encounter the grunts get back in the truck. The hummers could be used more for fire suppression rather than troop transport in extraction.

Kakashi · Post by **Kakashi** » 2006-05-16 09:37

I would pay to shoot an RPG or C4 that baby. 10+ kills thank you very much! Hee Hee. Yeah that would be really cool, make it so it withstands a few RPG shots, thus forcing the team to wrok together to blow it to hell, or get swmapped by the enemy.

Also, i know it wouldnt really work in BF, but an RPG button should be added, so if a sniper spots an Anti Tank unit and is not able to shoot him (Cos hes ran round a building or something), he can warn his Suv buddies where he is By shouting 'R!P!G!'. Ive been watching Black hawk down to much...sorry...i'll go now.

mavit · Post by **mavit** » 2006-05-16 17:44

black hawk down is a decent movie.....skinniessssss therrrreeeeeeee evvvvveeerrrrryyyyyywhhhherrrrrrreeeeeeeeeee!!! ...

..

...
..

Kakashi · Post by **Kakashi** » 2006-05-16 18:54

lmao yeah

I watch that movie sooo much >_<

puts you off joining the army knowing things like that could happen though

Eden · Post by **Eden** » 2006-05-16 19:08

Kakashi wrote:lmao yeah

I watch that movie sooo much >_<

puts you off joining the army knowing things like that could happen though

Erm not to go off topic, but anyone who joins the army for any other intention expect to be shot at and eventualy be killed is makeing a big mistake.

thats one of the reasons I find it so stupid that mothers are sueing the Army for there sons death.

5m0oth_0p3r4t0r · Post by **5m0oth_0p3r4t0r** » 2006-05-16 19:46

Eden wrote:Erm not to go off topic, but anyone who joins the army for any other intention expect to be shot at and eventualy be killed is makeing a big mistake.

thats one of the reasons I find it so stupid that mothers are sueing the Army for there sons death.

well.. if you're talking about the american army I can understand the mothers.. they should be sueing their government though.. for lying about the reasons to go to war..
I bet their kids didn't join the army to be used as private tools of the white house and to line the pockets of executives at Halliburton, Chevron Corporation and others.. this is what's happening though..

TII · Post by **TII** » 2006-05-16 19:49

5m0oth_0p3r4t0r wrote:well.. if you're talking about the american army I can understand the mothers.. they should be sueing their government though.. for lying about the reasons to go to war..
I bet their kids didn't join the army to be used as private tools of the white house and to line the pockets of executives at Halliburton, Chevron Corporation and others.. this is what's happening though..

You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

dunkellic · Post by **dunkellic** » 2006-05-16 19:58

well, besides the fact that he uses some 1337 speak, not everything he says is wrong. didn´t bush lie about the reason to go to iraq (but continuing this discussion is more than off-topic, so keep it)

5m0oth_0p3r4t0r · Post by **5m0oth_0p3r4t0r** » 2006-05-16 23:55

TII wrote:You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Man, the way you react, one might just think I know exactly what I'm talking about..

Or maybe it’s just you who don’t..?
anyways.. I’m not up for a debate on the subject.. and, judging from your foul language, it seems neither are you.. so let’s leave it..

Kakashi · Post by **Kakashi** » 2006-05-17 00:34

TII dude, you just got your *** own3d XD.

TII · Post by **TII** » 2006-05-17 17:28

5m0oth_0p3r4t0r wrote:Man, the way you react, one might just think I know exactly what I'm talking about..

Or maybe it’s just you who don’t..?
anyways.. I’m not up for a debate on the subject.. and, judging from your foul language, it seems neither are you.. so let’s leave it..

If you're not up for a debate the why bring it up to start with? You're nothing but a troll.

Bush didn't lie about the reasons to goto war. We thought he had chemical weapons, the British thought he had chemical weapons, hell Saddam himself said he had chemical weapons. The longer we're in Iraq and Afghanistan the more coward scum terrorists we can kill and the less likely they are to attack our home country again. If you're not smart enough to figure that out then I don't know what to tell you.

So what if Haliburton Chevron, and Exxon Mobile get rich? You think GM, Boeing and Grumman didn't make a killing off of World War Two? To the victors goes the spoils of war.

Extraction mode thoughts and tips

off topic

lol