Project Reality Forums

Vege wrote:I usually switch to INS side as i see it as more fun.
-Better weapons
-Not as strict gameplay
-Camp and harass
-Easier to win

It goes down to personal preference.
So don't bring that argument here.

I'm sorry if you don't even realize that you are not even disagreeing with what I said. I said MOST people wont debate the fact. Not EVERY single one. I ask everyone I can, when I play, and I get the same response the vast majority of the time.

The fact is that 99% of the servers without auto balance will find NATO outnumbering insurgents, and often times by a significant amount.

ps - Of course it's a personal preference. It just happens to be a personal preference of most people. So don't tell me not to "bring that argument here". I just want to provide constructive criticism.

[R-CON]ReadMenace wrote:In addition to subtracting 10 intelligence points from the Coalition team, which is significant considering that it takes 50 pts to reveal a cache, and you only recieve 1pt for killing an insurgent.

-REad

I think there is a problem of understanding the mentality of a large portion of the players here (Lets call them dicks). A **** wont care if his team gains or loses intelligence points. A **** will care if his kill score is lowered to zero. The dicks ego will hurt.