Page 2 of 2
Posted: 2006-05-18 17:50
by 5m0oth_0p3r4t0r
Solitas wrote:If their anything like the BH's guns I'll be happy, from little knowledge I have the AH-6 is used in a minor offensive roles sometimes anyway.
Besides that does it bother anyone else that whenever the pilot twirls or turns sharply none of the soldiers sitting on the side DON'T fall off?
not sure.. but it would be
damed stupid not to be strapped in if you're sitting on the outside of a helicopter..
that's MOST likely what keeps people from falling off..
Posted: 2006-05-18 17:54
by Malik
Still, you can do insane barrel rolls then plough into the floor without the passengers even flinching.

Posted: 2006-05-18 18:34
by the.ultimate.maverick
5m0oth_0p3r4t0r wrote:not sure.. but it would be damed stupid not to be strapped in if you're sitting on the outside of a helicopter.. that's MOST likely what keeps people from falling off..
How does that explain it when a pilot is near the ground, when safety straps would have been disengaged, pulls a violent maneouver - this would throw the soldier flying wouldn't it?
Posted: 2006-05-18 18:55
by Solitas
Blimey I'm starting to wish I never made the bloody joke
Posted: 2006-05-18 18:55
by Wraith
lol, I been there there maverick. I flew out the damn door and landed in the water thank god.
Posted: 2006-05-18 19:38
by Armand61685
Top _Cat the great wrote:Yuo can not have a littlebird that can both carry passengers and have mini guns! SO really the present mini bird is all transport and i like it that way.
It is more of a flying humvee, not a troop carrier due to ability to only carry 6 (can never be cahnged to 7, unlike Black hawk).
Why not? If the marines have it in real life, why not in PROJECT REALITY...sheesh
Posted: 2006-05-18 20:18
by perectshot69
this thread was about mini guns they are already planing tto put them on dont post anymore
Posted: 2006-05-18 20:27
by trogdor1289
Unless an admin determines that this thread is turning into a spam thread and closes it people can keep posting.
Posted: 2006-05-18 20:32
by Top_Cat_AxJnAt
lol,
Armand61685 -you might be right, it is jsut i have never seen a troop carrying littlebird with miniguns. It is just a mistake on my part.
Ijsut thought they where always kept seperate, miniguns and troop transporting.
O well, personally i am happy with 2 different types, not some verison imbetween.
Posted: 2006-05-18 21:12
by Pence
Top _Cat the great wrote:lol,
Armand61685 -you might be right, it is jsut i have never seen a troop carrying littlebird with miniguns. It is just a mistake on my part.
Your the one who is right, the Littlebird comes with either seating benches or miniguns and rockets.
Posted: 2006-05-18 21:14
by Rhino
Pence wrote:Your the one who is right, the Littlebird comes with either seating benches or miniguns and rockets.
correct. Its only EA who think it dose....
which may i add, is going to confuse people for the rest of there lives.
Posted: 2006-05-18 21:15
by Top_Cat_AxJnAt
i htought, but did nto want to hurt his feelings, hope he does not read this. But really i could not be bothered to put up a decent argument.
Posted: 2006-05-18 21:38
by 5m0oth_0p3r4t0r
personally, I would sooo like to see the “upwardly mobile” forces taken down a notch.. I mean armament wise.. attack helis and planes are a pain in “we all know where” when you’re on foot.. I’d much rather see more transport/supply duties being carried out from the air and less “Gunshipping” ..
ok, the “gunshipping” is realistic, but it would be more fun if helicopters were to move troops and equipment around more and destroy less..
might not be the most popular opinion, but that just goes to show it’s MY opinion..
Posted: 2006-05-18 21:41
by Rhino
dont worrie we aint going to chuck in 5 LB gunships and 1 LB transport

Posted: 2006-05-18 22:17
by mavit
ok im confused.......so you cant get a lb with miniguns and rockets and benches???? lol that would be funny have them all and the guys on benches are straddling a flaming minigun
Posted: 2006-05-18 23:20
by LeftSkidLow
5m0oth_0p3r4t0r wrote:personally, I would sooo like to see the “upwardly mobile” forces taken down a notch.. I mean armament wise.. attack helis and planes are a pain in “we all know where” when you’re on foot.. I’d much rather see more transport/supply duties being carried out from the air and less “Gunshipping” ..
ok, the “gunshipping” is realistic, but it would be more fun if helicopters were to move troops and equipment around more and destroy less..
might not be the most popular opinion, but that just goes to show it’s MY opinion..
I think you will find there will be less whoring from the air, less plane campers, and more teamwork if this was done. Personally, I also enjoy transporting/scouting more than attacking with a gunship.
Don't put a minigun on it, you will get noobs flying it just for points.
word..!
Posted: 2006-05-19 00:04
by 5m0oth_0p3r4t0r
LeftSkidLow wrote:I think you will find there will be less whoring from the air, less plane campers, and more teamwork if this was done. Personally, I also enjoy transporting/scouting more than attacking with a gunship.
Don't put a minigun on it, you will get noobs flying it just for points.
like the title said, word..
ok, I'm fronting an input that is on my side.. but, what the heck.. I agree with all he said..
'[R-DEV wrote:Rhino']dont worrie we aint going to chuck in 5 LB gunships and 1 LB transport
word, again..
Posted: 2006-05-19 01:09
by NikovK
I think the Blackhawk should have one minigun removed. That gives it four dedicated carry points instead of being half gun platform, half jeep.
Posted: 2006-05-19 04:22
by perectshot69
PLEASE NO MORE POSTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i got the fact i wanted to get acros the ah 6 little bird is contraersial ok it it fine now NO POSTS