Project Reality Forums

Ome99 wrote:By the time version1.0 comes out, it could be Iran!!!

Or north korea FTW?!?!?

yea i dont think people would realise what it is if the name changed...

Ome99 wrote:By the time version1.0 comes out, it could be Iran!!!

Wow, I don't like that idea!

[R-DEV]ZZEZ wrote:In 1.0 you all get shipped to Afghanistan to experience reality

OH HELL NO!

dhl... just... no... That post was just full of fail man...

Read the forums

Anyway RL is already a game... As far as what ive been told, its supposed to be funny.

dhl1986 wrote:given the age of BF2, and the newer games on the horizon that would support a better project reality mod, do you think its likely we will even SEE a version 1.0?

We have like 20 DEVs who would say yes, without a doubt.

PR1 WILL continue regardless of PR2's status

[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto wrote:We have like 20 DEVs who would say yes, without a doubt.

PR1 WILL continue regardless of PR2's status

It's simple, if it gets really desperate, skip the 0.9 and 0.95 releases, go straight to 1.0

It'll end when it ends..

[R-DEV]Chuc wrote:It'll end when it ends..

not likely. i can imagine [R-ZOMBIE] Chuc makin animations from beonde the grave. Actually, im going to build a little shrine. yea i know it was a little 3rd personey there, but i wanted to illustrate a point.

I agree with okita, and 'project' could also mean that the mod isn't exactly super realistic.....so it would infer that the mod is here to balance good gameplay with good realism.

I like to see "Project" as continuos transformation, nothing final, and it will keep going after we reach the 1.0 mark.

Kind of amazing that I got this much discussion without lockage
Oh and Hugh, nice sig/avatar combo

As much as it would be interesting saying "I'm just going to play some Reality now", we all know that changing the name from Project Reality would just be bad PR. (bad dmn tsh)

Just call it Battlefield Reality