Project Reality Forums

0331SgtSpyUSMC wrote:I believe we have two sets of scopes right now because they each have a specific role in the squad, and not to just have a choice. You are right however, sometimes even a guy with ACOG could find himself in a CQB situation, so Rudd's solution would be pretty cool to have.

Oh yeah, ACOG should only be used in a supporting role like you said, but yeah, sometimes you'll find yourself in CQB. Im elated that theyre doing away with "dolphin diving" so that even in its current state the ACOG would have a fighting chance in CQB.

PS- Thank you for your service, its the Volunteer state living up to its name

i like that idea of ditching the Bino's for deployed/ not deployed for the m16/m4...

Now i wonder if they will add the new Acog to PR in post PR0.9

A bit off subject here lol but it would be really nice to be able kick some doors in instead of phosphorous grenades
(right click on meele maybe)

if they added that feature.. not only would that be so awesome, but it would possibly make this game better then every other shooting game out there..

It all comes down to whether the DEV's want to keep Binoculars in every kit or not.

Nothing about having two weapon slots sharing the same ammo count is impossible.

Herbiie wrote:DarkSide, sounds like you love the ACOG

but tbh I like it how if you are going to be in CQB you take ironsights/aimdot, if not you take ACOG, it means that those who are aware of their situation have an advantage of those who go "Woot ACOG".

P.S Darkside: Why is PR depicted as a 6 foot black dude?

Hey, I just found the picture and thought, "hmm, this picture depicts the reality of how advanced a mod that's based off a 5 year old game is compared to a game that just came out 6 months ago." But seriously, ArmA 2 is awesome if you want to just play by yourself unless you know about the specs of military vehicles, because the get a huge F for the engineering of the sounds. Nothing sounds right, except the AK-47 and M-16/M-4 because it's hard not to screw them up.

P.S. Herbiie, I really do hate the ACOG. If I ever had to use my rifle IRL, I seriously doubt that I would need to shoot further than 200 yards, and even then that's probably a bit too far for my SWAG.

LUKE_NUKE_EM wrote:Because all Marine riflemen are issued ACOGs, correct?)

In a way, you are correct. All Marines (infantry, logistics, air wing) that are deploying are issued an M16A4/M4A1 with an ACOG attached. The rifles usually still have the rear sight apature attached (at least mine did when I deployed), so that's used as a back up if the ACOG 1. breaks 2. fails 3. gets seriously off of its BZO and there's no time to zero the rifle.

Adetter wrote:WHy not make it like the LMG kits,undeployed and deployed in that case but why not have 2 slots? You guys know what i mean.

Because that would defeat the purpose of the Acog vs Aimpoint decision you have to make in PR. plus it would take up and extra weapon slot, which are already at a premium.

I grow tired of this resuggestion being discussed.

Locked.