Project Reality Forums

Target_Practice_117 wrote: I want to see a dedicated Kokan sever

No matter how good a map is....a 24/7 Server is the work of the devil!
I freaking hate 24/7 servers, especially if there are 100's of them (Counterstrike/Team Fortress)

In terms of the idea, I like Wanda Shan most. But I havent even played it yet, so my vote goes to Kokan. Really, servers, replace all 4km vehicle maps with Wanda Shan - so that I could enact them bloody border "skirmishes" between the USSR and China.

Wanda Shan has awesome layout, which requires teamwork, shame it lags for some people.

So far Iron Eagle is my favorite, although all new maps are impressive in terms of overall quality. More 4km maps is what PR needs.

Burning sands for me

Kokan is an epic map.
Nicely balanced, you can play either side without the feeling that the other side have the upper hand.
Had some great battles on it so far.

Burning Sands - Unplayable for me anywhere near the city (fills memory/really choppy). The armour battles in the desert are simply awesome though.

Iron Eagle - Nice for mech inf although it seems a little cramped flag-wise. Epic map for CAS.

Kokan - my favourite so far out of the new maps.

Wanda Shan - Still have not managed to play one round from start to finish without the server dying or a ctd

Kokan is the only one I've played so far so... my answer choice is obvious.

Voted for Kokan, because of the awsome layout. at first i thought that this map looked weird (no offence). But after playing this map with each of its mini urban areas, boating down the river with the m60 smaking the talibans faces with some lead, awesome ambushes, convoys, healing endless team members after being zeroed in by some U.S. HE mortars then repeal anouther assault, my mind has changed! Thank you again map makers for the awesome warzones!

Eagle is really nice

NyteMyre wrote:No matter how good a map is....a 24/7 Server is the work of the devil!
I freaking hate 24/7 servers, especially if there are 100's of them (Counterstrike/Team Fortress)

Never make 24/7 server, map will get boring, begin to suck, be overplayed and there goes another map like muttrah.

Its troo that it attracts players, but its the same stuff as our favourite Justin Bieber, you commercialize the map to death, and in my oppinion that is dissing other maps that people were making to make you stick at PR instead of banging chicks.

In my world it would be that (if all maps are 95% stable every map gets a place in the maplist (except skirmish layers) and they are played through and through with different layers.

24/7 is like playing poker with 4 aces.

Kokan because most of the buildings are not repeated

At the moment I would say Kokan or Iron Eagle.

Kokan has some really tense fighting, looks awesome and is just perfect in almost every way. Only thing I don't understand is the US FOB at the bottom of the map, don't quite make sense to me, but oh well...

Iron Eagle is different from everything else, mountains and valleys everywhere, loads of assets and lots of fun, love it.

Burning Sands doesn't seem like it's finished to me, random DoD around the place and some details here and there, but the map itself is awesome, British Kashan!

Wanda Shan I've only had one go at, lagged like mad for everyone, and I only got to see one 8th of the map or so, yet to make up a decision

Not voting just yet

STORM-Mama wrote:ave only played Kokan so far... Don't see how it's that special. It's a nice map, sure, but havn't we been spoiled with this kind of maps? Feels like Korengal without hills, or an mix of Lashkar and Asad. Please explain to me how it's THAT good as some people obviously think!

Agreed. +1

I haven't played much of Kokan (not since release day) but all the others I have.

Iron Eagle is wonderfully new and different. Though I worry about terrain masking in the future and giant gaping distances between flags.

Burning Sands is again wonderful, but the new car feeling is a bit worn on me since I tested that map , its close between these two.

Wanda Shan, love the design though I'm undecided on the intent to provide a 4km map without reasonable transport means. It makes the map focus heavily on logistic trucks, which by no means is bad, but can lead to some pretty stalematey battles.

Target_Practice_117 wrote:I want to see a dedicated Kokan sever

EDIT: Ninja'd by tommy

iron eagle is my favorite becuase of SOMETIMES epic infantry battles in Bijar and the cave bunkers, plus awesome CAS

The armour takes a bit too much terrian damage from my viewpoint, however it is still a badass map.

ave only played Kokan so far... Don't see how it's that special. It's a nice map, sure, but havn't we been spoiled with this kind of maps? Feels like Korengal without hills, or an mix of Lashkar and Asad. Please explain to me how it's THAT good as some people obviously think!

Because the map offers a unique gameplay experience where the US rape at range, but when they get into the village they're often outnumbered and outgunned.

Looking forward to playing Wanda Shan the most - looks like a slightly better and more atmospheric version of Yamalia.

Don't. The combat is reduced to short bursts when one vehicle finds another, and an APC driving across half of the map loses half of its health simply due to the jagged nature of the terrain, including logistics trucks which also can't climb small hills...

Kokan easily , all other 3 are terrible.

I've only played a full round on Iron Eagle, and that was pretty good
Kokan is alright as well

Kokan is some great fun, Burning sands is next, then Iron Eagle, but I'm hoping they fix the flag layout bug on Iron Eagle, so we can have more epic battles in Bijar. And Wanda Shan is nice but some air transport seems necessary for a 4km map.

theflidgeface wrote: but some air transport seems necessary for a 4km map.

I disagree. IMO it's awesome that this map is not typical. People just have to adjust.