Page 2 of 2

Re: Best Anti Aliasing setting performance quality ratio

Posted: 2011-02-17 10:40
by MrTomRobs
Like a few people have said, I've found I get better FPS rate by Anti-Aliasing. I've only tried the first level so far, but from running around 24fps or so, i'm now getting into the 90s, even on heavily wooded maps and such. In urban areas i tend to get around 60 to 70.

Re: Best Anti Aliasing setting performance quality ratio

Posted: 2011-02-17 17:31
by Zoddom
whatshisname55 wrote:Actually I would consider it a good thing that you had Super Sample set while taking screens because it has higher visual quality than Adaptive Multi Sample. If you were able to run on Super Sample without too much FPS drop you should use it at least when taking important screenshots.

hmm well, at least in my CCC preview i cant notice any difference between AMSAA and SSAA.
well, the screens gonna be 800x600 anyway.

Re: Best Anti Aliasing setting performance quality ratio

Posted: 2011-02-17 22:13
by Pvtpile
Silly question guys but does settings say your AA to 16 and Override any application in the Nvidia control panel actually override the ingame AA settings?

Re: Best Anti Aliasing setting performance quality ratio

Posted: 2011-02-17 23:59
by whatshisname55
If your drivers are working correctly, yes.

Re: Best Anti Aliasing setting performance quality ratio

Posted: 2011-02-18 06:41
by Atkinson
For me Ati Tray Tools just couldn't force the normal AA so I use the in-game AA instead. Weird.

Re: Best Anti Aliasing setting performance quality ratio

Posted: 2011-02-18 19:55
by inlifex
Win XP Pro 32
AMD Phenom X4 9560 ~ 2.3
XFX 750a SLI
4 GB gskill
EVGA GTX 260 OC
Corsair 400W PSU
Acer 23" @ 1900x1200


I run all setting high with x16 AA and nVidia Application-Controlled for AA.
My FPS are average and don't get lag or high fps at all, all runs smooth.

I was in the process of switching over to a new case, hd, psu, and heatsink (using stock :S ) when I burnt my vid card :o ops: ... so with the new hardware I might get some higher fps if nothing goes wrong this time :lol:

Re: Best Anti Aliasing setting performance quality ratio

Posted: 2011-03-30 11:27
by illidur
whatshisname55 wrote:I've got an i7 930 at stock 2.8GHz. Would that be the problem? I haven't gotten a chance to do any OCing on my CPU but I will get to it eventually and hope to see some sort of performance increase. Any other specs you're interested in can be found in my profile.
I run PR at max settings at 1920x1080. Hold on, I took some screens last night for comparison, I'll post em up in a bit.

Here they are, "BF2 Settings" means 8x AA and 16x Anisotropic Filtering set in BF2, type of sampling was set in CCC:
24x Super Sample AA + 16x Anisotropic Filtering | Set 2
BF2 Settings - Super Sample AA | Set 2
BF2 Settings - Multi Sample AA | Set 2

The sample rate didn't seem to make a difference in quality or framerate. The type of sampling however has noticeable differences between Multi Sample AA, Adaptive Multi Sample AA, and Super Sample AA. I use Adaptive Multi Sample currently for a nice balance between quality and performance and I chose to let BF2 handle the sample rate since I didn't notice any difference. I did see a large difference in texture quality on the ground and soldiers' clothing between 16x Anisotropic Filtering through CCC and the same rate through BF2. I've decided to override BF2's AF through CCC because I didn't notice a difference between framerate but CCC forced 16x AF looks much nicer than BF2's.
how do you get ccc to force aa? i haven't been able to get it to work for bf2. yet i could with nvidia. i hear about ppl turning off "catalyst ai" but i dont know how. im guessing renaming the .exe is not a valid method.....

Re: Best Anti Aliasing setting performance quality ratio

Posted: 2011-03-30 16:45
by declan54321
Pesticide wrote:Hi peepz,

what would you guys say is the best Anti Aliasing setting (getting rid of jaggies) that looks sharp but also doesnt drop your fps to hard. Keep in mind i ask this question to people who only accept good quality, as i have a fairly decent rig and play with everything high and AF 16*

My only experience sofar is using 4* ingame bf2 native anti aliasing, i did not see a difference compared to 8* just a massive fps drop.

My ati 6970 has so many options like adaptive aa , super aa , etcetera i simply cant figure out which one is best quality and stil allows me to maintain a decent framerate.

Which setting you guys use ? Lets also maybe compare screenshots to determine what looks best. Ill have a mutrah city screenshot and a screenshot of a map with a lot of undergrowth, yamalia really kills my rig with all the gras when sniping/zooming/binos

Mutrah ImageShack® - Online Photo and Video Hosting

yamalia ImageShack® - Online Photo and Video Hosting (this stuff really makes my videocard burn , fan goes crazy loud
A 6970, and you can't max the Anti-Aliasing???

I 'only' have a GTX280, yet I have set it to the highest possible (16xSQ)

Re: Best Anti Aliasing setting performance quality ratio

Posted: 2011-04-01 14:38
by illidur
lol i just made a bf2.exe that was a bat file which starts the real bf2.exe renamed oblivion.exe ... ya.... not happenin.
but renaming the exe works to play vanilla w/ forced settings! just not pr.

how am i supposed to force aa with this cursed ccc!?

Re: Best Anti Aliasing setting performance quality ratio

Posted: 2011-04-01 14:42
by TommyGunn
From some reason/s (unknown) since i turned on anti aliasing, i don't see anymore "black and white", just Red to pink screen and blaaaaaah - dead.