A person can imagine can't they? :3[R-DEV]Rudd wrote:^ understand those layers are primarily there for soppa to test the ability to include 128 player GPOs, they might not even work as they are- we'll see.
First its only one server and second, when did you play last time? Sisu crashes less than all 64 players server put together currently.Redamare wrote:there are already 128 p / 114 ish player servers running for testing 128p first is too demanding and crashes even the servers are laggy with the amount out now for the testing
Why would you like more jets. The amount of heavy assets with 128 is perfect as it is now, everything more causes just unnecessary clusterfluff and chaos. The main idea behind more players is to bring back infantry to those empty and boring asset maps.Maverick wrote:I sure pray to god you've added extra aircraft(jets) Please hold it on a Tuesday or Thursday as I won't be able to make it since I will be taking my asvab
At least have an extra fighter/bomber. When I take out the MiG and frogfoot, that's a boring 20 mins im flying in circles. Occasionally flying around ad dropping bombs and that's if the A10 is dead. If you were the ONLY air asset up, and there were NO infantry giving lases(happens in pub matches ALOT) Then it gets real boring REAL fast... Why can't you bring an extra fighter and a bomber? Not that hard, we now have 64 players on one team now, im pretty damn sure it's doable.Brainlaag wrote:First its only one server and second, when did you play last time? Sisu crashes less than all 64 players server put together currently.
Why would you like more jets. The amount of heavy assets with 128 is perfect as it is now, everything more causes just unnecessary clusterfluff and chaos. The main idea behind more players is to bring back infantry to those empty and boring asset maps.
Only additions should be light transports, transport helicopters, light assualt vehicles (not even that) and maybe some additional logistics vehicles.
1st: Imagine a 3vs3 dogfight on a 4x4 map.Maverick wrote:At least have an extra fighter/bomber. When I take out the MiG and frogfoot, that's a boring 20 mins im flying in circles. Occasionally flying around ad dropping bombs and that's if the A10 is dead. If you were the ONLY air asset up, and there were NO infantry giving lases(happens in pub matches ALOT) Then it gets real boring REAL fast... Why can't you bring an extra fighter and a bomber? Not that hard, we now have 64 players on one team now, im pretty damn sure it's doable.
I still would like to see 2 fighters and two bombers. More AA will be manned(Infantry/tanks will be scared to go without AA support, so they won't go without AA or else their just cocky a holes, why do you think that tanks die by a bomb from up above?(no AA support near) Maybe your F16 pilot got shot down not because of his skills, damn missiles need a revamp, but maybe they died by AA? If so, then the tanks are at fault for not taking it out) so it will balance it out. I call it the warfare tree. Just makes things more epic. Also, what if you two are searching for eachother the entire 3 hour match?(happened twice lol, actually pretty suspenseful) 2 fighters and 2 bombers, means that the AA will have to be with the tanks to cover them(hense the term TEAMWORK) and the tanks cover AA. Every armored vehicle needs to protect eachother or it will NOT work. Your team will NOT succeed. Just as the fighter protects the bomber? same deal on the ground.Brainlaag wrote:1st: Imagine a 3vs3 dogfight on a 4x4 map.
-You lock on, you get locked on you dodge, 2nd turns around locks you, boom you are gone. Now the enemy team has 3 jets capable of bringing havoc to the groundforces. As there is 3 of them, they don't even have to worry about AA. (This is possible in both ways, either you win or them and the opposing team is doomed).
2nd: As there are more players on the ground (infantry FTW), you'll have a lot more people lazing a lot more enemies and their assets.
A simple calculation. Double amount of infantry on ground + Double amount of hostile footmobiles + More lazes = More fun for CAS pilots.
The more of you infantry grunts on the ground the less teamwork I need to bomb you. Blind bombing on bunkers of kashan yields huge profitsss. Not to mention the awesome KDR.Brainlaag wrote:2nd: As there are more players on the ground (infantry FTW), you'll have a lot more people lazing a lot more enemies and their assets.A simple calculation. Double amount of infantry on ground + Double amount of hostile footmobiles + More lazes = More fun for CAS pilots.
Sad sad shame that I don't play PR at ALL for score.TheComedian wrote:The more of you infantry grunts on the ground the less teamwork I need to bomb you. Blind bombing on bunkers of kashan yields huge profitsss. Not to mention the awesome KDR.
Its all downhill from here[R-DEV]Rudd wrote:alraedy drunk at 1825hrs...I'm ashamed, ASHAMED
You might get 1-3 kills per bomb but what use is that for your team when a tank shows up lased and your out of bombs.TheComedian wrote:The more of you infantry grunts on the ground the less teamwork I need to bomb you. Blind bombing on bunkers of kashan yields huge profitsss. Not to mention the awesome KDR.
Can you run 128 for FH2 then?[R-CON]Soppa wrote:
Peps we don't have permission to run v0.966 on Sisu when its released, this means more beer!
and more BEER!
and some more!
Too bad AAVs and Manpads are utter **** against everything. Rudd pointed out the rest.Maverick wrote:I still would like to see 2 fighters and two bombers. More AA will be manned(Infantry/tanks will be scared to go without AA support, so they won't go without AA or else their just cocky a holes, why do you think that tanks die by a bomb from up above?(no AA support near) Maybe your F16 pilot got shot down not because of his skills, damn missiles need a revamp, but maybe they died by AA? If so, then the tanks are at fault for not taking it out) so it will balance it out. I call it the warfare tree. Just makes things more epic. Also, what if you two are searching for eachother the entire 3 hour match?(happened twice lol, actually pretty suspenseful) 2 fighters and 2 bombers, means that the AA will have to be with the tanks to cover them(hense the term TEAMWORK) and the tanks cover AA. Every armored vehicle needs to protect eachother or it will NOT work. Your team will NOT succeed. Just as the fighter protects the bomber? same deal on the ground.
Damn good idea!Nebsif wrote:Can you run 128 for FH2 then?
Evil plan...evil plan.vishuddaxxx wrote:looks like someone paid 100 euroes for sub contracting the sisu server for 2 weeks, forgotten hope 2 for next two weeks on sisu... dam
sisu.kompassi.com