Project Reality Forums

Arnoldio wrote:On a certain server youre familiar with, maybe. On others, people that do this will be dealt with accordingly.

I don't know of any servers with admins that don't get rid of the tkers, sorry to disappoint you. But the situation of a single HAT will be like in the OLDDDDD versions of PR with sniper kits, admins quite simply aren't psychic as some may think, and they can't forsee teamkillers before it happens. I'm just guessing that having a single kit on an asset heavy map might lead to some problems with the newer players of the PR community, only speculating mind you. Other than that, the changelog does look interesting, although I do like the M-14/21 DMR for USMC . Sad to see it go after it finally got the fixes to its optics, I remember when it still had vanilla crosshairs that were as thick as a finger and covered half the screen.

milosv123344 wrote:I understand your logic but you cannot seriously make decision of what army will be in PR based on the army's might. Talibans, militia, they dont have the numbers OR the weaponry OR technology and they still kick ***. Plus no one really heard of any Canadian military acomplishments ,same as with Brazil, and they are still in PR. All Canada is, is a puppet state for the US to help when needed.

You could have added many conflicts, Syrian army vs the rebel mercenaries, some African conflicts, there is a lot of them going on in the world. You could have added Serbian army vs Albanian terrorist where serbs go cache hunting like Americans do on Korengal valley for example etc etc....

We dont need war copy from world that what factions was fighting. i would like to see map where is us vs uk, hamas vs taliban.

CroCop wrote:Cant believe someone actually fell for that

I did not...

Wanda Shan was awesome. I do not know why people hated on it so much. Sadly they did not put it back again.

Spook wrote:Wanda Shan was awesome. I do not know why people hated on it so much. Sadly they did not put it back again.

too focused on vehicles was cited. This is a problem for small 64 player servers, because with such little infantry, the whole game mode of AAS kind of falls apart, this happens on kashan sometimes too. However, if 100 player servers become official in 1.0, which they ought to, then this issue should be fixed, even if 32 players are operating vehicles, or doing non-infantry tasks on foot like sniping, or sabotage, then there still ought to be 18 infantry left over, which is enough to tend two flags, right?

Oh, and I wonder about the winter maps from years ago. I mean there were 3 or 4 high quality maps with unique vehicle skins and player skins, in unique settings, why are they not official?

In fact there is not any actual snow material in the game. So on those winter maps, water spashing sound was playing while you were walking or riding around, and sand would get blown up by shooting the ground.
Combine that with nonexistent or low quality winter camo for infantry and vehicles, and you have something that is pretty much under PR quality standard.

Some of these maps very really simple, with minimal amount of statics, but still there were some quality ones, that I can agree to.

adding snow material instead of sand to the ground could be done in the patch I imagine.

Excuse my complete inability to search, but will there be any new insurgency maps in Afghanistan or the middle east?

Will the French be fighting conventional armies or will there be a mix between insurgency and AAS?

Omaha9999 wrote:Excuse my complete inability to search, but will there be any new insurgency maps in Afghanistan or the middle east?

Will the French be fighting conventional armies or will there be a mix between insurgency and AAS?

Sangin map is anticipated, dont know if it already is in the changelog, and that is set around Camp Bastion, Afghanistan, i believe.

As for the other one i had to check with FF design plan, and it says they will have Congo Insurgency as the only insurgency map, but that one seems to be on hold?
(looks promising though)

https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f354-c ... m-wip.html

Omaha9999 wrote:Excuse my complete inability to search, but will there be any new insurgency maps in Afghanistan or the middle east?

Will the French be fighting conventional armies or will there be a mix between insurgency and AAS?

impossible to tell exactly what new maps are coming. As far as I know, the french get the current marlin, a jungle map against the chinese army and two insurgency maps. Of those, only marlin and the jungle map are guaranteed, the other two are against factions that arent finished.

Though, sangin may make an appearance, which is a 4KM brits vs. talib map.

actually, apparently the african factions are pretty much finished, so yeah there will be some ins for the french.

I heard from a dev there were going to be "at least two-dozen" new maps, but obviously nothing's certain.

ALFABETAS wrote:We dont need war copy from world that what factions was fighting. i would like to see map where is us vs uk, hamas vs taliban.

Yeah me too, it would be pretty interesting, i know its doable, we have a minimod for pr which removes deviation and adds few maps in it , we did China vs MEC , USAvsCanada , Canada vs Brits and so on, and it was a lot of fun, certanly makes the game weirder in a way...

ShockUnitBlack wrote:I heard from a dev there were going to be "at least two-dozen" new maps, but obviously nothing's certain.

Haha, I'd be impressed if it were so.

ShockUnitBlack wrote:I heard from a dev there were going to be "at least two-dozen" new maps, but obviously nothing's certain.

that's.. a lot, I hope a few of the older, imbalanced maps are phased out along with it.

https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f10-pr ... -s-38.html
Have no idea if that's true or not. My estimate prior to that statement had been maybe a dozen on the high end.

if every map got a night version, and those counted..

Guys if you like really wanna hear news about maps then decode the lines with the giant sign that says LEVELS. However do note that this is just the first Beta build so you sure as hell aint gonna get the full picture for 1.0

CroCop wrote:Guys if you like really wanna hear news about maps then decode the lines with the giant sign that says LEVELS. However do note that this is just the first Beta build so you sure as hell aint gonna get the full picture for 1.0

i've tried, it's like solving a maths problem with too many variables, you just can't work it out. I see a bunch of map names I cant decode

LEVELS: MxxS Kxxxn, added layer xxx
LEVELS: Fixed Fxxxxt Fxxe (amokandy) 343

Ah man I remember my first round of Wanda Shan, Katarn was playing, EVERYONE asked him on all chat about Crysis.

"Don't ask Katarn about Crysis!" from the loading messages in 0.85

40mmrain wrote:i've tried, it's like solving a maths problem with too many variables, you just can't work it out. I see a bunch of map names I cant decode

LEVELS: MxxS Kxxxn, added layer xxx
LEVELS: Fixed Fxxxxt Fxxe (amokandy) 343

LEVELS: MAPS Kokan, added layer AAS
LEVELS: Fixed Forest Fire (amokandy) 343

Can anyone help me with this one? Its a pretty interesting one:
WEAPONS: Removed the incendiary grenade. It will only be a mxxxxy now. (afterdune) 16430

Oh, and the most important addition of 1.0:
WEAPONS: Added 'wave' to civilian and unarmed kits (chuc) 16946