Project Reality Forums

kanakeitto wrote:This is what happens when team full of admins gets their asses whoped in the start of the round: everyone from the SQ that follows flags in cap order gets kill commanded

PRTA PR server rule 4.3 states: You are prohibited from attacking the opposing team’s first capable flag or any flag on the way to it from their main base until 10 minutes of gameplay has elapsed; unless it is active in the AAS order, or you are able to spawn on it

Proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaKvwzXy788

Infringement of same, simple rule, within 24 hours. Well done PRTA )))))

Last night I had good fun leading my squad of "randoms". Maps were Iron Ridge and Karbala Insurgency Infantry (weird choice, but it turned out to be enjoyable)

The admins online were aware and responded to reports and managed the fucktards that were griefing accordingly. Sadly this is not always the case on PRTA (almost never), I guess it shows when you have more mature and experienced admins on-line rather than power hungry hypocritical ones.

btw If you want teamwork to happen pick infantry layout more often, ESPECIALLY in the evening; assets are either played by experienced groups which usually do their thing ignoring the rest of the team, or by noobs that keep wasting them resulting in massive ticket loss.

While we are playing Beirut at this moment on the server, the IDF is camping Russian factory and repair station.
Their rules clearly says:
8.1:Attacking main bases and repair stations is prohibited. This includes camping the DoD and any choke point leading out of it.The only exception to this rule is when the main base is an active and cap-able flag.
It's not an active flag or has not been for the entire round for IDF.
Here's the list of active admins on teamspeak (!admins is disabled) who need to read their rules.
http://prnt.sc/euttgu
No action being made against rule breaking.
All admins are on the IDF side.
If we try to tell them in all chat they just warn to "Cut all chat" and looks like !r function is not answered either when rules are being broken

So when the server is 50v50 some admins don't switch people because it will break the balance.
Last round on ramiel was 46 USA against 36 ARF (With no mics or teamwork).
Asked for balance because it's what they usually want.
Nope. All the admins are on USA team so no need for balance.
Also asked on teamspeak why they didn't and like usual they won't respond.

https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f29-pr ... -read.html

Please try to remember these rules guys.

I got the impression that the admins were pretty responsive when it came to switches last night, at least for me. Nothing good or bad about it, just glad that PRTA does switching again, caught me by surprise.

But then again then there's this...

MasterHenaz wrote:Last round on ramiel was 46 USA against 36 ARF (With no mics or teamwork).

'[R-DEV wrote:Mineral;2161271']https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f29-pr ... -read.html

Please try to remember these rules guys.

Nice, so you are just ignoring Bluffers post?

And to add some feedback:
I made the mistake of playing on PRTA two days ago. We played Bamyan and I got warned multiple times by an admin for taking the HAT kit. His argument was that I am in APC squad and thus I can't the HAT. Funny thing was that he was in armor squad...

Geronimo wrote:Nice, so you are just ignoring Bluffers post?

No I dis-approved his posts and infracted him.

Geronimo wrote:I made the mistake of playing on PRTA two days ago. We played Bamyan and I got warned multiple times by an admin for taking the HAT kit. His argument was that I am in APC squad and thus I can't the HAT. Funny thing was that he was in armor squad...

It's only allowed if you're friends with an admin:

Just shows what a joke this server is defended by the dev 22 pages of mainly negative posts but should of been 50 pages untill you deleted the feedback you didn't like other people.to see Bluffer spoke the truth about PRTA and the server if you don't like it change how the server is ran not delete and ban the user for giving his opinion that happens to be the same opinion as most of the decent clans and players in this community.

Poor quality administration team poor standard of game play and you don't want poor feedback on it ..

Look forward to my email saying I've been infracted and my post has been deleted

https://youtu.be/UXoNE14U_zM

MasterHenaz wrote: Last round on ramiel was 46 USA against 36 ARF (With no mics or teamwork).
Asked for balance because it's what they usually want.
Nope. All the admins are on USA team so no need for balance.
Also asked on teamspeak why they didn't and like usual they won't respond.

I did respond to you

No worries guys. I'm working on a solution for this problem.

Some clan/community leaders will get PMs either by me or Vista.

Played a couple rounds with some friends last night and there seems to have been responsive admins. If you actually want to address the problems with the admin team you might have to break it down to an admin by admin systemic rebuild. I won't name anyone but the admin(s) on last night were doing their job just fine, and it makes me wonder if some of this isn't people making a mountain of a mole hill.

Just to be clear I have had my share of experiences with horrible decisions on the part of an admin team, so I am all for dealing with abusive/lazy admins. I just didn't see it at all last night, so I begin to wonder if it might be a few specific admins who lack the qualities needed to do the job properly.

Murphy wrote:I begin to wonder if it might be a few specific admins who lack the qualities needed to do the job properly.

May be its the other way around.A few specific admins have the qualities to do the job properly.

For what is worth, =MeRk= BluFFeR was right in one thing.
Don't ask the PR Team to revoke a license if not even the forum community, mostly "veterans", can't even stop playing in this server for more than a week.

It's up for the other servers to do a campaign to increase their admin power; Mainly to avoid having no admins at seeding times or losing their admins in peek hours (both situations that I witness in recent days at other EU servers)

'[R-CON wrote:UTurista;2161319']For what is worth, =MeRk= BluFFeR was right in one thing.

Its up for the community to choose which servers they want to seed.

Already being handled

well....every time i ask admin to switch team to be with by friend ... i always get ignored ....
but i still play because well no other alternatives really....
well....
overall...
i think i will say it ok server just because i dont really want to get banned .

'[R-CON wrote:UTurista;2161319']For what is worth, =MeRk= BluFFeR was right in one thing.

Its up for the community to choose which servers they want to seed.

Don't ask the PR Team to revoke a license if not even the forum community, mostly "veterans", can't even stop playing in this server for more than a week.

yeah how dare we ask for such things after all the extreme malpractice that was going on and is STILL going on for so fucking long.... dont make me fucking laugh....

I agree with Murphy. I still play on PRTA every now and then, and from what I experienced there are really good admins while some of them are just ****. I think it is up to PRTA to correct the admins who have been failing to do their jobs properly. But it is also up to the community to give the PRTA staf specific names. Is there any kind of list? It would be good to have a list of 'bad' admins supported with video evidence to actually prove to PRTA how much some of their admins are failing to do what they are supposed to do. This thread is too much of a rant now, I guess if we wan't change we should prove it.

(I know some people already posted actual evidence, good job if you did)




D.J.

[R-CON]Mr.VdHeide wrote:I agree with Murphy. I still play on PRTA every now and then, and from what I experienced there are really good admins while some of them are just ****. I think it is up to PRTA to correct the admins who have been failing to do their jobs properly. But it is also up to the community to give the PRTA staf specific names. Is there any kind of list? It would be good to have a list of 'bad' admins supported with video evidence to actually prove to PRTA how much some of their admins are failing to do what they are supposed to do. This thread is too much of a rant now, I guess if we wan't change we should prove it.

(I know some people already posted actual evidence, good job if you did)




D.J.

yeah lets make a bad admin list on a server that has "!admins" disabled, where nobody knows who does what most of the times. SMART suggestion....did you even read anything in this thread despite murphies post??? lol
and lets also ignore all the senior admins covering for their admins. their general policy of silencing people on their forums and straight up IGNORING reports.and lying about stuff in public.and so and so on....but yeah you are right, there is nothing really substantial here, only a few bad admin apples, right? LMAO