stabilizers on abrams?
-
Mora
- Posts: 2933
- Joined: 2007-08-21 12:37
-
Mora
- Posts: 2933
- Joined: 2007-08-21 12:37
Re: stabilizers on abrams?
So.. can i have attack chopper gunner stabilization for 0.8? 
-
kristofer
- Posts: 149
- Joined: 2006-05-02 12:27
Re: stabilizers on abrams?
Dude, you're obsessed with attack choppers.Mora wrote:So.. can i have attack chopper gunner stabilization for 0.8?![]()
"Bad area round 'ere boy,
a lotta bad types,
a lotta mean people...
a lotta nutters."
Beafy: sleep is too tireing
a lotta bad types,
a lotta mean people...
a lotta nutters."
Beafy: sleep is too tireing
-
Mora
- Posts: 2933
- Joined: 2007-08-21 12:37
-
Scot
- Posts: 9270
- Joined: 2008-01-20 19:45
Re: stabilizers on abrams?
I'm sorry but what your saying makes me really sad, really making the Suggestion forum pointless. Even if 80% of the forum, and there are also a fair few serving members who aren't DEVs say its a good and realistic idea, but the DEVs don't want it, it won't go in and no amount of community input can sway them?? Like I said, that makes me sad.'[R-DEV wrote:Masaq;597270']*Sigh* The stabiliser is a good piece of work. I like it, I'd like to see it in-game.
However:
It won't go into PR unless the DEVs want it to go into PR.
Polls on whether or not it should go in are pointless - as has been said many times before, the Devs are making this game with their own interests at heart. Just because 60, 70, 80% of the forums might say they want to see it in it doesn't mean they would add it.
Is it worth adding, in my opinion? Absolutely.
Do I think it WILL get added, in time? Yes.
Do I think that frequent posts about how "the Devs never respond to suggestions and ignore the community's wishess" will acheive anything? No.
PR isn't a democractic community. Hate to say it like that, but it's as simple as I can make it.
Last edited by Scot on 2008-07-29 20:03, edited 1 time in total.

-
kristofer
- Posts: 149
- Joined: 2006-05-02 12:27
Re: stabilizers on abrams?
Mora wrote:O rly? Hehe.

"Bad area round 'ere boy,
a lotta bad types,
a lotta mean people...
a lotta nutters."
Beafy: sleep is too tireing
a lotta bad types,
a lotta mean people...
a lotta nutters."
Beafy: sleep is too tireing
-
agentscar
- Posts: 1266
- Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26
Re: stabilizers on abrams?
I couldn't agree more Scott.I'm sorry but what your saying makes me really sad, really making the Suggestion forum pointless. Even if 80% of the forum, and there are also a fair few serving members who aren't DEVs say its a good and realistic idea, but the DEVs don't want it, it won't go in and no amount of community input can sway them?? Like I said, that makes me sad.

-
ReaperAce712
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 2008-06-08 16:56
Re: stabilizers on abrams?
ive heard punkbuster only pisses everyone off with nonsense PB kicks and hardly catches anyone using aimbot or cheats or whatever.gazzthompson wrote:yea!!! then we could give all infantry wall hacks aswell??ive heard of punk buster ?
"Cluster bombing from B-52s is very, very accurate.
The bombs are guaranteed to always hit the ground."
-U.S. Air Force
-
General_J0k3r
- Posts: 2051
- Joined: 2007-03-02 16:01
Re: stabilizers on abrams?
no it's not useless. it's being read by the crew on a regular basis and things that make sense and are doable get in, those who aren't don't. the fact that it's the crew's decision what to use and what not doesn't make the forum useless...TheScot666 wrote:I'm sorry but what your saying makes me really sad, really making the Suggestion forum pointless. Even if 80% of the forum, and there are also a fair few serving members who aren't DEVs say its a good and realistic idea, but the DEVs don't want it, it won't go in and no amount of community input can sway them?? Like I said, that makes me sad.

