Page 11 of 11

Posted: 2008-03-20 17:41
by Mora
Well it does help for yaw stabilization. I see no reason to not implant it.. even if it only helps a bit, it will only make it better.

Re: stabilizers on abrams?

Posted: 2008-07-29 14:56
by Mora
So.. can i have attack chopper gunner stabilization for 0.8? :P

Re: stabilizers on abrams?

Posted: 2008-07-29 18:26
by kristofer
Mora wrote:So.. can i have attack chopper gunner stabilization for 0.8? :P
Dude, you're obsessed with attack choppers.

Re: stabilizers on abrams?

Posted: 2008-07-29 18:47
by Mora
O rly? Hehe.

Re: stabilizers on abrams?

Posted: 2008-07-29 19:58
by Scot
'[R-DEV wrote:Masaq;597270']*Sigh* The stabiliser is a good piece of work. I like it, I'd like to see it in-game.

However:

It won't go into PR unless the DEVs want it to go into PR.

Polls on whether or not it should go in are pointless - as has been said many times before, the Devs are making this game with their own interests at heart. Just because 60, 70, 80% of the forums might say they want to see it in it doesn't mean they would add it.

Is it worth adding, in my opinion? Absolutely.
Do I think it WILL get added, in time? Yes.
Do I think that frequent posts about how "the Devs never respond to suggestions and ignore the community's wishess" will acheive anything? No.

PR isn't a democractic community. Hate to say it like that, but it's as simple as I can make it.
I'm sorry but what your saying makes me really sad, really making the Suggestion forum pointless. Even if 80% of the forum, and there are also a fair few serving members who aren't DEVs say its a good and realistic idea, but the DEVs don't want it, it won't go in and no amount of community input can sway them?? Like I said, that makes me sad.

Re: stabilizers on abrams?

Posted: 2008-08-02 16:29
by kristofer
Mora wrote:O rly? Hehe.
Image

Re: stabilizers on abrams?

Posted: 2008-08-02 16:32
by agentscar
I'm sorry but what your saying makes me really sad, really making the Suggestion forum pointless. Even if 80% of the forum, and there are also a fair few serving members who aren't DEVs say its a good and realistic idea, but the DEVs don't want it, it won't go in and no amount of community input can sway them?? Like I said, that makes me sad.
I couldn't agree more Scott.

Re: stabilizers on abrams?

Posted: 2008-08-02 16:40
by ReaperAce712
gazzthompson wrote:yea!!! then we could give all infantry wall hacks aswell?? :roll: ive heard of punk buster ?
ive heard punkbuster only pisses everyone off with nonsense PB kicks and hardly catches anyone using aimbot or cheats or whatever.

Re: stabilizers on abrams?

Posted: 2008-08-02 17:04
by General_J0k3r
TheScot666 wrote:I'm sorry but what your saying makes me really sad, really making the Suggestion forum pointless. Even if 80% of the forum, and there are also a fair few serving members who aren't DEVs say its a good and realistic idea, but the DEVs don't want it, it won't go in and no amount of community input can sway them?? Like I said, that makes me sad.
no it's not useless. it's being read by the crew on a regular basis and things that make sense and are doable get in, those who aren't don't. the fact that it's the crew's decision what to use and what not doesn't make the forum useless...