Re: [Gameplay] Insurgency
Posted: 2008-12-08 22:05
Better yet. Install, play insurgency and then post feedbacksakils2 wrote:People, stoppppp arguing about G3. Wait till 0.85 comes out, install it, play insurgency and ONLY THAN COMPLAIN.
Better yet. Install, play insurgency and then post feedbacksakils2 wrote:People, stoppppp arguing about G3. Wait till 0.85 comes out, install it, play insurgency and ONLY THAN COMPLAIN.
These are not complaints about the G3 itself, I'm fully pleased at its inclusion. I'm not implying that the insurgents will be overpowered with it as a spawnable kit, I'm not concearned about how it may work in game. I don't need to play 0.85 to figure out that an insurgent squad full of G3s'll look a tad unrealistic.sakils2 wrote:People, stoppppp arguing about G3. Wait till 0.85 comes out, install it, play insurgency and ONLY THAN COMPLAIN.
They are. One side saying:" No, G3 is realistic for INS!!!" Second side:"No, bulocks, this sucks, there will be a full ins squad running with G3's!"All some of us have mentioned is the possible AK-G3 ratio, nobody is arguing.
Who said there will be full squad with G3's? Have you seen INS squads full with G3's in 0.85?I don't need to play 0.85 to figure out that an insurgent squad full of G3s'll look a tad unrealistic.
Obviously, the G3 is a popular weapon, perhaps not as widespread as the AK variants, but still very popular. Also, it seems quite likely that the MEC would provide aid to the insurgency, since they are both fighting the US and GB. So all this debate over the the propriety of the G3 is absurd....until 1995 the G3 in various modifications served as a general issue shoulder weapon not only for German Armed forces, but also for many other countries. Those include Greece, Iran, Mexico, Norway, Pakistan, Portugal, Sweden, Turkey and many other countries. Total of more than 50 countries during the last 40 years issued the G3 to its forces. The G3 was or still is manufactured in countries like the Greece, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Portugal and others.
Any link between MEC and Ins/Taliban is impossible to prove as PR does not have any storyline or timeline : MEC could have been created way after the occupation of Iraq.Charity Case wrote:Also, it seems quite likely that the MEC would provide aid to the insurgency, since they are both fighting the US and GB. So all this debate over the the propriety of the G3 is absurd.
sakils2 wrote:They are. One side saying:" No, G3 is realistic for INS!!!" Second side:"No, bulocks, this sucks, there will be a full ins squad running with G3's!"
Who said there will be full squad with G3's? Have you seen INS squads full with G3's in 0.85?![]()
9 AKs - 1 G3'[R-DEV wrote:Jaymz;865376']
There are many reasons why Insurgents in Iraq have access to G3's. They have been found in abundance by coalition forces in Iraq due to them either being left over from the Iran-Iraq war, or have more recently been supplied to Insurgents by neighbouring countries.
All of these pictures are of confiscated weapons in Iraq
![]()
8 AKs - 1 G3'[R-DEV wrote:Jaymz;865376']
![]()
What looks like an AK barrel in the bottom left corner - 3 RPGs - 1 G3'[R-DEV wrote:Jaymz;865376']
![]()
2 AKs - 1 G3'[R-DEV wrote:Jaymz;865376']
![]()
NOOO! you're missing our points aswell! We like the G3 as it is, it is awesome, we love it! It will just look unrealistic to see ins squads FULL of G3s. In a squad of 6, you would see 1 G3 max to be realistic.[R-DEV]CodeRedFox wrote:Hows this, we just make the deviation really really bad for the G3.
See solved![]()
I forgot to add smiley to my last post...Sabre-Oz wrote:My 20c AUD.
Get over it. Its just abit of variation in weapon choice for a faction which before had very little, the weapon has been proven to be used by insurgent forces in current conflicts, the number of which is irrelevant of course there is more AK's IRL, there more AK's than just about anything out there, plus as chuc said your basing this of 0.8 weapons. Out.![]()