Page 14 of 34

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-12 22:09
by Heavy Death
To be honest, week ban would be in order.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-13 00:49
by AlonTavor
Snowman11 wrote:Alon, I suggest you try to catch someone from management on TS or the website.
Liam, to be honest, it really looks like an accident.
Messaged Tobi, No response.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-13 01:39
by mectus11
PRTA has a great policy, out of sight out of mind. it's working so far and it baffles me how there's virtually no proper backlash for it.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-13 08:34
by Clund
[R-CON]AlonTavor wrote:Messaged Tobi, No response.
Tobi is really busy with RL and very inactive in general. Try messaging GHOST or Hudson.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-13 15:31
by MasterHenaz
Ghost got removed from admin team and Hudson resigned so no luck from any of those there.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-17 05:46
by Hayal_Israeli
FYI Hudson is back.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-17 05:51
by Hayal_Israeli
[R-DEV]Mats391 wrote:You need to rework you asset rules. On maps like Khami the armor squad claims 5 assets and is allowed to lock with 4 players in it. In past days I have witnessed that quite a bit and usually those 4 players end up losing one tank after another ensuring that their team loses.
No, 2 same assets squads are allowed, when as you said there are 5 assetd belonging to armor its possible to open and armour 2 squad. Its written on the rules and, when an asset squad is locked with less people than assets avalaible admins will mostly tell to unlock.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-17 07:28
by fecht_niko
Hayal_Israeli wrote:No, 2 same assets squads are allowed, when as you said there are 5 assetd belonging to armor its possible to open and armour 2 squad. Its written on the rules and, when an asset squad is locked with less people than assets avalaible admins will mostly tell to unlock.
Privat Hayal what does mostly mean and who decides when you can open a second armor squad?

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-17 08:19
by LiamBai
Hayal_Israeli wrote:when an asset squad is locked with less people than assets avalaible admins will mostly tell to unlock.
But it's often admins in these squads.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-17 09:01
by PacD
When i played khami std on PRTA there was a armour sq locked with 6 ppl instead of 8, and it was Art of war and foxtrot. When I created "armour 2" i got nearly kicked for duplicating squad kappa.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-17 22:16
by MasterHenaz
Remember this when playing Khami alt
Armour 1 gets 2x BMP-2 in the beginning and 3 tanks after the delay.

Make armour 2 so you claim at least one tank.

The less people in armour 1 the more tanks armour 2 claim.

So if they lock the first armour squad with 6 people then armour1 needs to be notified or armour 2 claims 2 tanks.

Rules say it so:
3.3.1. Where not otherwise defined, the squad which has been waiting the longest for an asset to spawn gets the asset(s).

3.3.3 There is no limit to the number of squads permitted, except if the number of squads exceeds the number of suitable assets available for which a squad has been named.

SO
Armour2 always claims 1 tank on khami. Unless one of the earlier armour assets have been given to a different squad.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-18 17:27
by DogACTUAL
Im like PRTA but your rules are really, really complicated sometimes. :)

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-21 17:16
by MasterHenaz
So a blueberry joined my squad and stole sniper kit.
I reported it but they tempbanned me.
Went to teamspeak to try to ask what's going on.
Admin said that it was Vatsug.
Got temp banned for someone else breaking rules and reporting him

He also temp banned another person for reporting the kit stealer.

I don't know why this guy is an admin there.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-22 09:06
by MasterHenaz
Giving feedback/suggestion on their website got me banned from their forums and teamspeak and game server.
"You have been banned for the following reason: Disruptive Behaviour."
When giving a suggestion which was already approved by moderator.

Only suggesting that they !kill command kit stealing people instead of warning.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-22 09:29
by exel82
Got permabanned from teamspeak, forums and the server for "disruptive behaviour" for no apparent reason

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-22 10:55
by KEBABELAIN
Got banned from forums and server for no apparent reason.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-22 11:08
by K-Massive
Got banned from forums and server for disagreeing with an admin.

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-22 13:18
by DesertFox284
Seems it's the other way around..
I do not think censorship is the right way to go, I am disgusted by PRTAs way of handling this situation.

I was silent so far BUT THIS CROSSES THE DAMN LINE.

Do you guys seriously think it's a good idea to run your goddamn server like this? You can't just take away someones right to play on your server because they criticise you. Ignoring feedback, censoring your forums then telling us here to go complain on them? What the hell guys?

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-22 13:45
by AlonTavor
Reminder

Image


"Art of Admining"

Re: PRTA

Posted: 2017-05-22 14:04
by LiamBai
Turns out I'm also banned from their forums, teamspeak and game server. ("Disruptive behaviour")

While I make no secret of my dislike for PRTA, I generally abided by the rules. Yesterday, when all this drama happened I had nothing to do with it. I didn't go on their forums or teamspeak, make any posts about it, etc.
Still I got banned. :p

This all comes in the wake of me being heavily disliked by PRTA for telling them better ways of doing various things(map choice, balance, admining, ...), so they just up and banned me. This is the PRTA way of solving things. If somebody says you're doing something badly, censor them; if nobody sees it then everything must be fine.

Things I've reported include admins not applying rules to themselves, kicking/resigning people for no reason, trolling in main, intentional teamkilling, lonewolfing, many of them multiple times. Out of all of these reports, only one has received a positive response saying that it would be looked into and such a thing wouldn't happen again(full squad getting resigned for no reason). Out of the other reports, most have just been straight up ignored, with others having admins post lies about having dealt with them when no such thing has happened.