Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)
Posted: 2013-07-31 06:49
Similar to the Open Beta?[R-DEV]BloodyDeed wrote:Servers are community hosted in 1.0 so a serverside password wouldn't work.
Similar to the Open Beta?[R-DEV]BloodyDeed wrote:Servers are community hosted in 1.0 so a serverside password wouldn't work.
No, 1.0 will work as every other release. So exactly like in 0.98 you will have dozens of servers hosted by all kind of different communities and clans.doop-de-doo wrote:Similar to the Open Beta?
Yes to all.reptilianhuman wrote:Battlefield 1.0 questions: Were any of the previous maps navmeshed for bots and are any of the 6 new maps navmeshed? Also, were there any updates for the Vietnam addon that will be in 1.0?
Prozac Ltd: Alone In My PrisonDavos wrote:What is actually the real name of the song vietnam_menu.ogg located in the pr_beta files?
Would like to play it myself on the guitar.![]()
In addition to what melon said, the bots are quite clever, the map layouts awesome, and PRSP is generally much more fun than everreptilianhuman wrote:Battlefield 1.0 questions: Were any of the previous maps navmeshed for bots and are any of the 6 new maps navmeshed? Also, were there any updates for the Vietnam addon that will be in 1.0?
Thanks for that and i don't mean to be a prick but you didn't quite answer my question.[R-DEV]BloodyDeed wrote:We added a View Distance Slider to the Launcher.
So you can lower the view distance if you can barely run PR.
But you have to live with the disadvantages though.
So i guess i won't see the SU-24 or F15E[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:The model is from Clivewil from Allied Intent: Xtended.
Jafar was going to do a highlight post on some of the new jets but never got round to it![]()
The thing is that many people still had major FPS drops in the last day of the beta. For me it was still unplayable and while I average 45fps in 0.981 I was playing with 5-20 in last day of beta. I though you promised it's going to run just as smooth as 0.981 and that things are going to get better since the beta...[R-DEV]AfterDune wrote:There's a massive difference (at least for lower-end pc's) if you compare beta day 1 with beta day 7. I couldn't play the beta properly on day 1, but as stuff got updated (especially the launcher), fps increased a whole bunch for me.
I think 1.0 open beta actually required less perfomance than 0.98, becouse I played on a 64 player server and it run way more better than 0.98, but in 100 player servers it was the same as in 0.98. And let's not forget that everything looks way better than before(more detailed maps, better effects and sound).[R-DEV]K4on wrote:In general, 1.0 requires still a bit more performance than 0.98 to run fluently though.
I guess 64p servers will still be available in 1.0 so you can play on them with no difference in fps from 0.98 but with better graphics and gameplay.The thing is that many people still had major FPS drops in the last day of the beta. For me it was still unplayable and while I average 45fps in 0.981 I was playing with 5-20 in last day of beta. I though you promised it's going to run just as smooth as 0.981 and that things are going to get better since the beta...