Project Reality Forums

everything on high on my new PC.
except AA, 4x, cause i think theres only little difference between 8x and 4x.
But there a still maps and spots where i got ~30 fps. But generally i play with lockfps 50-70

low, got 5 or less fps in maps like muttrah city

All on maximum = 100fps

Win7 x64
i7 920 - 2.8ghz
6gb ram - triple chanel
Radeon 4850 - 1gb

And Game it self is taking betwen 1.8-2.1 Gb ram. CPU 4-6 threads.

One problem! When I start the game with 2 monitors, the textures crash *(on the map flor).
Is there any solution for this problem?

Everything on as low as it can be or my computer would just explode! (Okay, not explode but a bit laggy)

Pushin it to tha max!

All high with little AA and AF at 1920x1080, although I have noticed my frames go down with recent updates. Still smooth for most part though so not complaining and not exactly running a beastly spec either.

Everything on low for me but my computer exploded and now im using one from about 6 years ago

Running on High, at least 100 FPS.

Everything at High with 4x AA and 1680x1050

I live high!

Maxed out

only took me 3 years

With my new computer I also play on highest settings (Video & Audio) incl. AA 8x8 and all other graphical filters.

All high.

That said, I had my texture detail set to medium for a while when a friend of mind told me its being set to high increased the probability of crashes.

I play with all high and no AA, except dynamic shadows and effects (medium). My GTS 250 seems to have some issues with BF2 mods and AA on.
--------------
I can play Bad company 2, Mass Effect 2, Fallout 3, Terran Conflict, vanilla BF2, etc. maxed with AA ..... but for some reason with FH2, AIX, NAW, and PR I occasionally get a strange graphic glitch that starts "rainbowing" in one quarter of my screen and then crashes.

(Looks like an over heating issue visually, but as I can play the newer games maxed with no problems.... it makes me think it may be driver related.)

Medium.

I play on Ultra. I don't have any misconceptions about the quality of my play, and being an average player (in terms of the entire player pool, not in terms of TLers) I would rather have a gorgeous looking game with no slowdown as opposed to a clunky looking one with no slowdown. I'll never be a super competitive player - if I somehow made it to a very high level, I might consider dropping down to High, but I won't go lower than that.
Also, I bought/assembled my first custom PC solely for the purpose of being able to run this game. The fact that it enabled me to play other games like GRID and Crysis doesn't matter - I bought this computer for StarCraft II and god damnit I'm gonna play it on Ultra if I can.

Still choppy on some parts of the map, but dont really wanna downgrade any further.
I'm already quite annoyed that i don't see mortar effects when i'm more then 100m away from impact. I just see people randomly flying into the air.

Run on High except for em' low fps maps like Burning Sands, Fallujuah, Archer etc.

Alizxa wrote:I play on Ultra. I don't have any misconceptions about the quality of my play, and being an average player (in terms of the entire player pool, not in terms of TLers) I would rather have a gorgeous looking game with no slowdown as opposed to a clunky looking one with no slowdown. I'll never be a super competitive player - if I somehow made it to a very high level, I might consider dropping down to High, but I won't go lower than that.
Also, I bought/assembled my first custom PC solely for the purpose of being able to run this game. The fact that it enabled me to play other games like GRID and Crysis doesn't matter - I bought this computer for StarCraft II and god damnit I'm gonna play it on Ultra if I can.

Alizxa this is the PR forums not Starcraft II

Now that I have my new rig I can finally play on all high with 8X AA