Re: Rifles against light armour.
Posted: 2013-04-12 14:00
MT-LB with NSVT(12.7mm) need zoom for gunner..
It's lead-free, that's where the "environmentally friendly" claim comes in. But if you don't clean up after yourself, whether it's projectiles, casings, or dead bodies, you're still a litterbug. Shame.ComradeHX wrote:I was thinking of this US army "M855a1" thing.
The supposedly magic bullet that pens 9.5mm of steel at 300m and is environmentally friendly(lol).
If MT-LB is 10mm armour...I am not expecting it to bounce too much.
Yes, that's pretty much a match-grade round; used to be limited to SOCOM, which is why it has a "Mk" rather than an "M" designation. For some reason SOCOM adopted the US Navy designation system for its purchases, but I'm guessing it was because the first name of the Commanding Officer of SOCOM at the time was "Admiral"USMC was supposed to get something called "MK318" or something?
If small arms go through the side of APC, for example, why not?mangeface wrote:Umm...question is who would want to fire small arms at an APC? That's like ringing the dinner bell.
Many times I have fired small arms to get the attention of an APC even a tank to distract them long enough to allow a player with a HAT reload, or from seeing an approaching friendly tank. Doesn't always work but worth a try once in a while. Surprising how many gunners will get distracted and ultimately diemangeface wrote:Umm...question is who would want to fire small arms at an APC? That's like ringing the dinner bell.
exactlymangeface wrote:Umm...question is who would want to fire small arms at an APC? That's like ringing the dinner bell.