Project Reality Forums

Souls Of Mischief wrote:Reread the comment that sparked the discussion. It had nothing to do with the amount of SF units who do use optics.

It does, or are you going to tell 45th that they are doing it wrong?

Armchairman_Mao wrote:It does, or are you going to tell 45th that they are doing it wrong?

ComradeHX back again with the shitposting.

Souls Of Mischief wrote:ComradeHX back again with the shitposting.

Who?

Just because your "logic" got turned around that does not mean I am shitposting.
Here's the thing: because there are Russian SF that use various optics and there are SF that do not, whether SF uses optics has nothing to do with whether optics are better or worse.

So, the one closest to shitposting is you.

If you were really trying to argue against the claim that ironsight is better(instead of shitposting), you would have posted pictures of "polite people" in Crimea with PK1...etc.

Armchairman_Mao wrote:Who?

Just because your "logic" got turned around that does not mean I am shitposting.
Here's the thing: because there are Russian SF that use various optics and there are SF that do not, whether SF uses optics has nothing to do with whether optics are better or worse.

So, the one closest to shitposting is you.

If you were really trying to argue against the claim that ironsight is better(instead of shitposting), you would have posted pictures of "polite people" in Crimea with PK1...etc.

Oh, what's that - you're banned now. Geee, I wonder why.

I do agree that the 1P29 optic is extremely bulky and hard to use for infantry, but also agree that iron sights are just fine for most engagements.

However, the PKP Pecheneg has a 1P78, so why not move it over to the AK-74M as well? There seems to be plenty of evidence of it being at least somewhat widespread (1P78 5.45x39, pics of Crimea at bottom), and it has a much better reticle but slightly lower zoom (2.8x).