Some new weapons?

TerribleOne · Post by **TerribleOne** » 2005-07-17 16:32

keyser Soeze.KIA. wrote:Dont think sweden is

I dont agree with all USA does i can tell you. USA are one of the biggest terrorist nations ever.

But hey lets not start a political discussion

Thats gonna cause a riot once an american sees it.

Tactical Advantage · Post by **Tactical Advantage** » 2005-07-17 17:26

One of the main reasons we call terrorist "terrorist" is because one of their main goals is to install a fear into others who arnt terrorist... I dont see America being a terrorist nation. Yes, America does have terrorist in it, mostly Sleeper Cells as refered to on the News, but same as all the other countries in the world... Right now I think America's biggest problem with terrorist in America is all the Rapist, Murders... But all in all, I think we can also consider them terrorist, so yes, America does have a terrorism problem. And even though I'm a strong patriot for America, I still dont agree with some of the decisions made in the past, but everyone is entitled to thier own opinion, so lets not have a massive blow out over this.

keyser Soeze.KIA. · Post by **keyser Soeze.KIA.** » 2005-07-17 21:15

Well like the US didnt hire mercenary in the 80s in southamerica to kill everything they saw etc.. theres millions of examel like that.

USA dont do any thing that dont gain themselves, look at bush and the kyoto protocal. wtf is up with that. The whole world goes together to try saving this planet and what does ur little Bush do? Ignoring it totaly.

Eddie Baker · Post by **Eddie Baker** » 2005-07-17 21:18

Soeze, quit starting political horseshit right fucking now.

Tactical Advantage · Post by **Tactical Advantage** » 2005-07-17 21:28

[R-DEV wrote:Eddie Baker]Soeze, quit starting political horseshit right fucking now.

AGREED Lets Stop all this before PROJECT REALITY becomes PROJECT BULLSHIT EACH OTHERS HOMELAND, I dont care if someone presents thier opinions in a mature manner, but you're starting to cross the thin red line of mature and childish.

keyser Soeze.KIA. · Post by **keyser Soeze.KIA.** » 2005-07-17 21:41

yeah i will, sry.

eddie · Post by **eddie** » 2005-07-18 00:15

DEV Eddie- i thought the British Support weapon was the L86 LSW? anyways, i would like to see that in there for the brits.
was right

http://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/pw/pw_sa80.htm

Tactical Advantage · Post by **Tactical Advantage** » 2005-07-18 00:30

eddie wrote:DEV Eddie- i thought the British Support weapon was the L86 LSW? anyways, i would like to see that in there for the brits.
was right http://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/pw/pw_sa80.htm

Not really, the L86 is just a diffrent version of the common infantry british weapon, if im correct, the brits use the M249 or M240.

Eddie Baker · Post by **Eddie Baker** » 2005-07-18 03:29

Tactical Advantage wrote:
eddie wrote:DEV Eddie- i thought the British Support weapon was the L86 LSW? anyways, i would like to see that in there for the brits.
was right http://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/pw/pw_sa80.htm
Not really, the L86 is just a diffrent version of the common infantry british weapon, if im correct, the brits use the M249 or M240.

The L86 Light Support Weapon was the standard fire-team automatic rifle, filling the role that the M249 SAW does in US forces. Since it was not much use as a base of fire weapon, they started phasing it out with the L110A1 (FN Minimi-Para) just in time for Afghanistan. There are probably a few still hanging around, though.

The L7 GPMG is a platoon level support weapon (L86 and L110A1 are fire-team and section-level weapons), either found in the maneuver support section of a rifle platoon or a machinegun platoon in an infantry battalion.

TerribleOne · Post by **TerribleOne** » 2005-07-18 14:15

Ive fired the L86 and the L85. Quite literally if you keep your aim steady the gun wil hit the same place. Many a time our groupings had 2-3 bullets going through the same hole.
Only problem is though they jam up allot. They were cleaned before and after use. The guys on the range who assisted with any problems all had screwdrivers in there pocket

and i would say at least every time on the range it would jam.

The General purpose (GP) single fire one was by far the worst, jammed all the time. its the same rifle but without the gas parts but who knows.

Just like to say also that all the rifles i saw had a scope on the top so i dont think the iron sighted model should be left without one.