Page 3 of 5

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-06-20 21:50
by Riadh98
Honestly making pr ww2 in regular PR:BF2 not making any sense i mean it will not be playble as much as The Regular one and Most of servers will not take care of it what i mean is making PR WW2 sperated it will be Pretty much good and everyone even new people will know that there is PR ww2 or there is a 2nd option that is making servers specially for ww2 and that's will awsome

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-06-20 21:57
by PatrickLA_CA
It's better this way, there's no need to split the very small community

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-06-20 22:06
by Riadh98
PatrickLA_CA wrote:It's better this way, there's no need to split the very small community
than at least they make seprated servers i mean specially for ww2

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-06-20 22:48
by 3===SPECTER===3
congrats on the update! no easy feat :)

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-06-20 23:44
by captainfuture
Again moochas smooches to the DEVs

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-06-21 00:45
by backstaberer1
You guys are so freaken awesome, luv you guys, P.R for life!!

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-06-21 02:42
by Arab
XAHTEP39 wrote:Amaizing! Grand work!
Will the AT-mines to dig in like as PR now?
Thanks!
I'm not sure if they currently dig in like the other mines, but might be safe to say it will :)

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-06-21 05:50
by AfterDune
Riadh98 wrote:than at least they make seprated servers i mean specially for ww2
That's up to the community :) . But I can imagine there will be servers that run "historical" maps, so WW2, Vietnam and Falklands.

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-06-21 21:51
by Riadh98
AfterDune wrote:That's up to the community :) . But I can imagine there will be servers that run "historical" maps, so WW2, Vietnam and Falklands.
i hope so :)

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-06-26 17:21
by Cazack
This is a great opportunity to call new players, you could get some sponsor to get a more bigger community :D

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-06-26 18:52
by Long.Dong.Dave
I think the equipment should be changed just a little bit:

-I think the STG44 should be like an Elite Rifleman kit or something that you get from a crate

-Pointmen should have SMGs, w/alts as rifles. I think max 2 SMGs per squad is an acceptable amount for WW2.

-German Army MG should just be the MG34 w/no alt. Or the Alt should be MG30(t) or a drum fed MG42 (shorter clip than MMG version)

-German Para MG should have MG34 w/ alt being the FG42.

-German Para SL should have MP40 w/ alt G43

-Idk if the US LAT kit has a bazooka from the image, but I think they should have AT grenades instead and the Bazooka reserved for the HAT kit

Thats my two cents on the kits

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-06-28 06:12
by ALADE3N
Long.Dong.Dave wrote:I think the equipment should be changed just a little bit:

-I think the STG44 should be like an Elite Rifleman kit or something that you get from a crate

-Pointmen should have SMGs, w/alts as rifles. I think max 2 SMGs per squad is an acceptable amount for WW2.

-German Army MG should just be the MG34 w/no alt. Or the Alt should be MG30(t) or a drum fed MG42 (shorter clip than MMG version)

-German Para MG should have MG34 w/ alt being the FG42.

-German Para SL should have MP40 w/ alt G43

-Idk if the US LAT kit has a bazooka from the image, but I think they should have AT grenades instead and the Bazooka reserved for the HAT kit

Thats my two cents on the kits
did US used anti tank grenades?, maybe we can use sticky bombs.

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-06-28 11:57
by agus92
HeneraLuna wrote:did US used anti tank grenades?, maybe we can use sticky bombs.
No sticky nades. AT were just from GL, afaik.

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-07-05 14:01
by Rammen4
Yo, Taylor, I'm really happy for you, I'ma let you finish, but Post Scriptum had one of the best videos of all time! One of the best videos of all time!

(And it's right round the corner)

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-07-05 16:49
by Long.Dong.Dave
agus92 wrote:No sticky nades. AT were just from GL, afaik.

The US paras def used Gammon Bombs in Normandy. The problem that I see with US AT is that there really was no squad AT weapon. There was usually one two-man bazooka team per platoon, but there could be more depending on allocations from the company command. I just feel if every US squad were to have a bazooka, they would have a significant AT advantage over the Germans, which historically should have the AT advantage cuz of panzerfausts.

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-07-18 15:00
by T.Bos
It is finally happening!

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-07-18 19:08
by Drake111
Yeah. Very nice news! It will be a good update. Especially new maps. I really like the map "Brécourt Assault". In vehicles must be great the model of "Panzer VI Tiger Ausf. H2".

I'm looking forward to it!

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-08-12 16:24
by shaun279
any words on Japanese troops? I assume it's already planned but making sure :)

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-08-12 16:38
by Mineral
Was in the works long time ago with Iwo Jima as main map. Currently no longer in the works but who knows one day :p

Re: PR:WW2 Status Update June 2018

Posted: 2018-08-16 15:31
by Idiot#3
Keep up the hard work.You guys got this.