Project Reality Forums

I want Falcon 4.0 style missions with at least 20 minutes of peaceful flying to target, and then 2 minutes of ingress, lofting the bombs over the target area and hauling ***, followed by another peaceful 20 minutes of flying back to base.

daranz wrote:I want Falcon 4.0 style missions with at least 20 minutes of peaceful flying to target, and then 2 minutes of ingress, lofting the bombs over the target area and hauling ***, followed by another peaceful 20 minutes of flying back to base.

20 minutes ?

Isn't that a little too much ?

More like 5 minutes, 10 max...

I really do wish it would take you 20 mins to fly the A10 to the city in Al Basrah

don't suppose you can fix the mouse free look to work in jets like it does in Jeeps? that way we could fly and look around the cockpit without loosing control of the craft and having to fly in a straight line - I know this would banjax people who fly jets with a mouse and keyboard, but who cares?

also id like to see relistic airfields not the normal VBF2 airfields! whit a hanger conected directly to the strip! not posible it would most sertainly mean CRASH! so i want a strip to taxi on!

KingLorre wrote:also id like to see relistic airfields not the normal VBF2 airfields! whit a hanger conected directly to the strip! not posible it would most sertainly mean CRASH! so i want a strip to taxi on!

Except planes in PR taxi like fat cows on tranquilizers. I've never been able to make a 90 degree turn on the ground without it taking five miles.

daranz wrote:Except planes in PR taxi like fat cows on tranquilizers. I've never been able to make a 90 degree turn on the ground without it taking five miles.

haha sig quote XD anyway. i think it has to be done! fat cow or not! BUILD US A HORSE! (a troyan ofcourse caus you cant fit in a real wone )

Yes. I agree with the 10 mins flying. But, we should have like 2,000 tickets on each side for a mass air-to-air map battle (32 F/A-18's versus 32 Jian-10's or MiG-29's/Mirages.

Even larger maps to accommodate the jets? And people want large realistic airbases?

God have mercy on us poor foot soldiers, 'cause the @#$! pilots have none....

What is the new armament for the F/A-18 and MiG-29?

krekc wrote:don't suppose you can fix the mouse free look to work in jets like it does in Jeeps? that way we could fly and look around the cockpit without loosing control of the craft and having to fly in a straight line - I know this would banjax people who fly jets with a mouse and keyboard, but who cares?

...but jets dont cant be controlled fully using only WASD.

Fenix16 wrote:...but jets dont cant be controlled fully using only WASD.

what part of "who cares?" did you not understand? Joysticks & Track IR FTW!!

TF6049 wrote:Yes. I agree with the 10 mins flying. But, we should have like 2,000 tickets on each side for a mass air-to-air map battle (32 F/A-18's versus 32 Jian-10's or MiG-29's/Mirages.

That would suck, and it won't happen anyway.

krekc wrote:what part of "who cares?" did you not understand? Joysticks & Track IR FTW!!

Yeah, its really too bad that Track IR isnt supported by bf2

It does work quite well, it just sucks that you lose control of your jet/helo because of the way mouse look is implemented so people can fly with keyboard and mouse.. if the jets were coded the same way as mouse free look works in jeeps then we would be in business. Now i'm not suggesting that helos be changes but I think jets are fair game