Page 3 of 3
Posted: 2007-06-04 21:51
by vanity
^^ I just saw your sig. Laughed out loud at that one.
LOL
Posted: 2007-06-04 21:52
by El_Vikingo
'[R-PUB wrote:Viper5']Why is fog hacking considered cheating? Are you actually trying to tell me that its an advantage for me to be able to see someone at 500m on Sunset City when they can see me at 75m? Its not cheating.
I'm picking up sarcasm there, although I'm not too sure. (?)
Posted: 2007-06-04 22:52
by Xmaster
DreadNaught117 wrote:i used a fog hack big deal but i did try killing guys on the carrier form the crane but that failed because svd's are long range rifles also it was a hacked hack i had some friend of mine break the coding for the hack and get it to work on my computer but took him a hour and me 20 bucks.
but aim bots using them is for pussys but map hacks, fog hacks, and stuff like that it's ok
What a moron.
Sorry but really had to say it.
On the other hand, i really need practice with sniping, god i love that class tho
Posted: 2007-06-04 23:04
by Mongolian_dude
vanity wrote:^^ I just saw your sig. Laughed out loud at that one.
LOL
Its missing:
I rly liked PR .4 but now its too complicated.
Bing back teh_.4 M4 but give it a silencer, laser, x20 scope, M203, rail interface, Graplin/zipling launcher, self destruct, microwaving abilities, psychic rays, fully auto shotgun, laser target designator and seconday fire plays heavy metal.
....mongol...
Posted: 2007-06-05 12:19
by Hx.Clavdivs
'[R-PUB wrote:Viper5']Why is fog hacking considered cheating? Are you actually trying to tell me that its an advantage for me to be able to see someone at 500m on Sunset City when they can see me at 75m? Its not cheating.
El_Vikingo wrote:I'm picking up sarcasm there, although I'm not too sure. (?)
Any confirms on this suspicion? Cause I could always pull the "-=OTB=-" incident file as an example.