Project Reality Forums

eddie wrote:LOL Sorry but the US Army don't use AA, at least nothing like the public version, I def don't think the British military would use a game based on the BF2 engine.... or we're screwed.

Nice job all the guys involved in setting this up, especially UK_Force. One question, is it properly moderated? E.G Not full of smacktards.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=92d_1185628915

Man that's pretty neat, I'm definitely going to have to play there.

Despite everything, I still frequently end up playing with squad leaders who don't really pay attention to what's going on (not all of them obviously) so in theory this server should be better. Maybe they'll come round and shoot people who don't play properly.

I must get a new microphone now, this could be a good server to play!

Cpt.Kawakowitsch wrote:Awesome... what are the motives of the Brit-Army to sponsor a PR-Server?

Recruitment, same as 'americas army' I guess

198ms from Alaska. I'll have to check it out.

Sturnn wrote:I didn't know the americans didnt use AA as there training thing, cos i kept thinking they did, but oh well. as for british army using BF2 PR we would probably be all creamed or at least by people who's served with the British army lol!.

US Army have a simulator of some sort that they use for training. America's Army is meant to simulate the soldier experience.

I joined the server and it was empty.

Erm, it says UK only, so only UK players?

Not really.

I played on the server yesterday and didn't notice any improvement in teamplay. Even the squad I joined which was lead by a UKArmynet SL and most of the squad was UKArmynet too and there was basically no voice chatter at all.

I've had worse experiences and by all means, at least they played the game and didn't do anything too stupid, but I was hoping for squads that at least communicate with one another.

Hopefully it will improve.

I havent played there yet but I dont see why it'd be automatically better and more comms isnt always better. Have to see how it develops really.
Only yesterday I died because 3 people in squad were speaking at once, the tank commander drove into the line of sight of another tank after telling me to fire at it, I was checking enemy infantary 90 degrees away

Do they play 32 player sized maps?

Dark_Wolf wrote:I played on the server yesterday and didn't notice any improvement in teamplay. Even the squad I joined which was lead by a UKArmynet SL and most of the squad was UKArmynet too and there was basically no voice chatter at all.

I've had worse experiences and by all means, at least they played the game and didn't do anything too stupid, but I was hoping for squads that at least communicate with one another.

Hopefully it will improve.

Please bear in mind we have got some lads who are "brand" new to PR, and are using the server to get to grips with it

We all know how different PR is to other FPS games





Cheers

Give it a while to be broken into by the regulars and it will be spick and span

hey all

hanging around in your server today but not so much activity

i'm in there right now with 'identitystolen'

hope to see some company!

Just to let the Community Know each Thursday @ 1800 - 0100hrs

as of Thursday 09 Aug

This Server will become Passworded for ABA Training, with a set ABA Profile.



This will hopefully stop any confusion again.


Thank You




UKF




.

*adds to favorites*

hope to play there

SGT.JOKER wrote:doubt youll see the US army sponsor a server......

Are you kidding?

The US army sponsored a game!

Pity it was ****... 0_o