Posted: 2007-08-14 23:13
I say; don't rush it, take their time to make them quality factions, not something thats just thrown in as a crack'n'smack party pack. 
No it looks way different and a lot more details. It looks better too and it is armed with 2 TOW missile tubes not the 4 AA missile tubes.Cheeseman wrote:Is the USI M2A3 Bradley the Vanilla model tweaked to carry more than 2 players?
I can always model a Bradley in the near future if I get the time.
SO you're saying you never want PR .7 to release!77SiCaRiO77 wrote:hopefull , afther FH2 relase![]()
Indeed, but I'm wondering if said faction teams are aiming for a 0.7 release.[R-DEV]Jaymz wrote:Depends on their status...
I am.Bob_Marley wrote:Indeed, but I'm wondering if said faction teams are aiming for a 0.7 release.
[R-DEV]NikovK wrote:The general trend of the last 100 years has been to scale down the service rifle in some way or another. Gewehr 98, Kar 98, Kar 98k. B.A.R., M-14, M-16, M-4. Gatling, .30 Browning, M-60, M-249. So on, so on... We'll all be running around with .05 caliber hyperautomatic needleguns complaining about stopping power as we potshot eachother's ears off at two miles with laser-guided sights by 2100.
And no I'm not calling the B.A.R. a standard rifle, but its duel-fire functionalty and box magazine do make it a forerunner to the M-14.
/OMG WTF WERE R THEYS?1GoofRatty(CDN) wrote:Tanks mate!
?LtSoucy wrote:HAHAHAHAHA i like the movie i hate hackers 2.
I say several years why?whens 1.0 out?