Project Reality Forums

So what games use the Frostbite engine?

Bad company.

'[T wrote:BludShoT;505150']Consider we all hate BF2, I don't think we're going to like BF3

bf3 *sigh*, im gonna stay with this mod as long as there is a server running , unless PR goes to bf3(providing its a true rumor) i used to love vanilla & the expansions, more i play the mod the less i want to ever play vanilla again.


Spoiled i guess

Skrew BF3! Arma2 here i come!!

I am just waiting for the inevitable single player mission where an American character mocks the Brits or the Europeans...

It is a dead game to me, ArmA 2 and OFP 2 will come out ang give us everything we want in terms of modability and realism mods for ArmA/ArmA2 are already awesome.

Five playable classes; Sniper, Assault, Engineer, Medic and Support

Five playable classes; Idiot lone wolf, Target practice, Roadkill, Points whore and Isnta-prone ammo spammer.* Fixed.

i like VERY MUCH bf2..

Waaah_Wah wrote:Skrew BF3! Arma2 here i come!!

Amen brother, but considering PR will make the move to BF3 IF it comes out, there is room enough in this world for the two of them.

Prydain wrote:I am just waiting for the inevitable single player mission where an American character mocks the Brits or the Europeans...

It is a dead game to me, ArmA 2 and OFP 2 will come out ang give us everything we want in terms of modability and realism mods for ArmA/ArmA2 are already awesome.


Five playable classes; Idiot lone wolf, Target practice, Roadkill, Points whore and Isnta-prone ammo spammer.* Fixed.

And brits dont mock Americans every chance they get?
Arma 2 = ArmA with new story. OFP2 deserves a chance though.
The kits are going to end up along the lines of bf2 again. Expecting to get revived in the middle of a firefight, then getting sniped (wonder if EA still wants 50 cal rifles to do 2 shot kills.) The game has "potential", but lacks innovation. Customization is a plus I guess, I like it, but it isnt the sims. Other than that, it all sounds pretty familiar.

LoL that 2 shot kill with the 50 is bs I looked at the stats of it according to my stats page the m95 is ment to do 190 damage per shot, so that means if I shoot a guy it will kill him once with the 100 and then I can't kill him with the 90 so wtf unless all players in BF2 have 200Hp then I should be able to get one kill and then just about another with the one bullet. <<< well that makes sense

Customization BF3= some how i find pimp my soldier quite funny(in a im not going to do it way).

Kenny wrote:LoL that 2 shot kill with the 50 is bs I looked at the stats of it according to my stats page the m95 is ment to do 190 damage per shot, so that means if I shoot a guy it will kill him once with the 100 and then I can't kill him with the 90 so wtf unless all players in BF2 have 200Hp then I should be able to get one kill and then just about another with the one bullet. <<< well that makes sense

Did you ever actually use the M95?

I don't care what the stats say, I played vanilla for quite a long time. I know that unless it's a headshot, the M95 will always take the enemy down to 2 blocks of life.

So, either all players in BF2 DO have 200HP, or the 190 damage is referring to headshots.

*spacecadett* wrote:Customization BF3= some how i find pimp my soldier quite funny(in a im not going to do it way).

I'll be the one with the scarlet scarf. If I can LEAN in that game.

If they can't modify the Frostbite to have leaning, then all games on this engine will never have it.

tbh, I'll probably switch to the new game series from NovaLogic, since all the damn EA games are turning into arcadey ****

... sorry for my outburst. It's just that I've been playing a game that has the lean function and now I remember why I missed it so terribly in the beginning.

OFP2 is going to suck massively. It's made by the producers, of OFP not the developers, the people who paid the game and no nothing of the game itself. Whereas Bohemia (ArmA. ArmA 2) developed the game and so can make a sequel that doesn't suck like a Shanghai Whore.

Producers making sequels always means they are terrible, Imagine Sierra trying to make HL2.

EPIC FAIL.

Well ArmA's graphics and vehical physics fail terribly...

Waaah_Wah wrote:Well ArmA's graphics and vehical physics fail terribly...

Sadly I agree with you on the physics:

Graphics on the other hand are amazing in ArmA.

I might actually buy BF3 if it's ever a chosen platform for PR's future, cause the engine seen in Battlefield Bad Company has shown (through media) to be quite interesting.

BetterDeadThanRed wrote:Amen brother, but considering PR will make the move to BF3 IF it comes out, there is room enough in this world for the two of them.

Where do you get this from?

I hope this will be the battlefield2 they actualy wanted to do... but because of ea dondt agve dice enough time to finish it up they went to limit it down and just finished everytjhing like it was.
However i am not surprized anymore if they make it again conquest only.. which already get very boring, they should leard from pr and make the aas2 and objective modes into it than it realy worths the money imo!

JONES wrote:I hope this will be the battlefield2 they actualy wanted to do... but because of ea dondt agve dice enough time to finish it up they went to limit it down and just finished everytjhing like it was.
However i am not surprized anymore if they make it again conquest only.. which already get very boring, they should leard from pr and make the aas2 and objective modes into it than it realy worths the money imo!

if they copy anything from PR i'd be surprised, because majority of peep like arcade like games. takes us nuts to love real stuff. LOL