Page 3 of 4

Posted: 2007-10-30 20:47
by Sabre_tooth_tigger
Theres alot of driver settings you set to performance or quality, for me they are all on performance. I just want it be fluid and the card is still struggling in a smokey firefight , thats why I say I would need twice as much processing power to get it perfect, turning on every single option is a massive drain.

I know some guys are using 8800GTX just to play PR which is slightly ridiculous considering 6800ultra was the best card at the time of the games release


Check out this guy, high res to him is 5700x1080. A gtx isnt fast enough :lol:

Posted: 2007-10-31 01:44
by Indecisi0n
Sabre_tooth_tigger wrote:Theres alot of driver settings you set to performance or quality, for me they are all on performance. I just want it be fluid and the card is still struggling in a smokey firefight , thats why I say I would need twice as much processing power to get it perfect, turning on every single option is a massive drain.

I know some guys are using 8800GTX just to play PR which is slightly ridiculous considering 6800ultra was the best card at the time of the games release

Check out this guy, high res to him is 5700x1080. A gtx isnt fast enough :lol:

I 100% agree.

I have been playing the COD4 demo and going from that to PR is like night and day.

PR/BF2 graphics are dated. I play for the gameplay now not the visuals like i do with COD4.

Posted: 2007-10-31 17:04
by AnRK
Can anyone gimmie some recommendations for a Motherboard, DX10 Graphics card and some RAM, and where to get them without purging my finances too much. I'd say I can spend at the most around about 300-400ish, I'd consider maybe a little more.

Posted: 2007-11-02 01:24
by Indecisi0n
Until the graphics look like this don't worry about game settings

Image

Image

Image

Image

Posted: 2007-11-02 01:25
by Indecisi0n
Image

Image

Image

Posted: 2007-11-02 12:28
by Wellink
mm call of duty 4 graphics arent so great TBH those soldiers look kinda weird. Or maybe iam spoiled by crysis!



Image
Image

Posted: 2007-11-02 13:15
by nedlands1
Don't rub it in :grin: . Well at least the less fortunate don't have to contend with Vista...

Posted: 2007-11-02 19:10
by Pluizert
I have a AMD 3500+, 2Gb Ram + 8600GT. If i want my fps to stay above 25FPS then my graphics for street must be all on Average + 4x AA...

The soldiers in COD4 really look bad. The lines around them are so ugly...

Posted: 2007-11-02 19:32
by Brummy
I think those COD4 soldiers have those lines because of his AA/AF?

COD4/Crysis all look worse than ArmA!

Image

Image

Posted: 2007-11-02 22:27
by Wellink
ARMA graphics suck...COMPARED to crysis!

Posted: 2007-11-02 22:48
by G.Drew
AMD 4800+ X2 939pin
DDR3200 or 3500 2Gb
GeForce 7600GT
Yusmart (19' LCD)

Settings:
All high
View dist: 100% (u would be mad not u have it on 100% anyway)
1280x1024 @75hz
going to try x4AA on, see how that works


and my rig sux on crysis, but thats only down to my GFX card
http://crysis.totalgamingnetwork.com/page.php?do=sysreq

EDIT: PR & now crysis is working fine thz to the new Nvidia beta driver

Posted: 2007-11-02 23:26
by Waaah_Wah
Find me a pic of the iron sights of the AK47 in ArmA and i will puke after 0.2 sec after looking at the arm. God ArmA is ugly!

Posted: 2007-11-03 01:12
by Indecisi0n
How do they look weird ?

Posted: 2007-11-03 14:02
by Masaq
[R-PUB]bosco wrote: :D
Nope, just did some color correction.

Btw I think the thing that is slowing your PC down is your video card.

So, going to share your colour profile? :p

Posted: 2007-11-03 15:11
by AnRK
I think the problem with alot of modern games is they try to look very Hollywood, so It's not so much a problem with the engines, just the way they are utilised. If if the PR team got their hands on any of those engines I'm sure they'd manage to tone down so they don't look so stupid.

Posted: 2007-11-03 15:23
by bosco_
[R-MOD]Masaq wrote:So, going to share your colour profile? :p
There isnt really a certain profile anymore because the new NVidia driver behaves strange for me.. I do it by hand everytime I play.

Posted: 2007-11-03 17:47
by SethLive!
Waaah_Wah wrote: God ArmA is ugly!
OrLy?



Image
Waaah_Wah wrote:Find me a pic of the iron sights of the AK47 in ArmA and i will puke after 0.2 sec after looking at the arm.
here you go
Image

i wish pr had iron sights like that :)

Posted: 2007-11-03 19:03
by Waaah_Wah
Alright :D Im pulliung back everything i said about ArmA's graphics. ArmA still has some messed up vehicle physics tho :)

What are those settings in that pic? Did you do anything with it to make it look better or something? :)

Posted: 2007-11-03 19:19
by Deadfast
My guess at the AK pic: post processing at max (blur effects), medium terrain, view distance ~2km

Posted: 2007-11-04 00:14
by RHYS4190
I find PR really laggy I care for perform more over graphics.
If you don’t get lag can you tell me witch driver you use and other things.
It strange I find 2142 looks better and is way smoother then BF2.