Page 3 of 3

Posted: 2008-03-10 12:08
by BloodBane611
If you have 64 players on a server, there should be an admin monitoring it. Out of 64 players there will definitely be some smacktards, and your admins should have privileges to change maps. It isn't a perfect system, but given that most of his regular players do like the small maps, it works better than not having the maps.

Posted: 2008-03-10 19:53
by Xotec|FloHMedic
I think it won´t be realy fun anyway (in my opinion).
Your frags would be maybe super high, but real fun? I prefer 16 Player maps with about 32 players. Enough to make a lots of kills, but not too many to get killed every minute.

Posted: 2008-03-12 22:59
by TF6049
When I outskill all of them (another thing ONLY IN vBF, NOT PR) I like it. More points to earn. :p

Posted: 2008-03-13 13:57
by MadTommy
[R-CON]CAS_117 wrote:Meh they're so seldom that I the few times I see them I always have fun. SAW ftw.
agreed... nice for a rare change...don't see it often.

Posted: 2008-03-16 22:06
by blud
I voted I don't care, because I can't vote yes or no, because the question is too vague.

EJOD 16 is fine for lots of players, but Jabal isn't. So it really depends on the map.

Re: POLL: Who enjoys 16 player maps with 64 people?

Posted: 2008-09-25 23:21
by fuzzhead
Thread closed, no longer relevant as 16 player maps have been switched out and skirmish maps switched in.