MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
SuperTimo
Posts: 2079
Joined: 2007-07-31 09:25

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by SuperTimo »

more AT missiles!!!!

i think BMP-3 is more realistic than the BTR-90. also imho muttrah should have a T-90, as in the city enviroment it can work well if used correctly but is still very vunerable to the cobra and AT missiles. it would just be somthing differnt to hsve on the map.
Image
Scot
Posts: 9270
Joined: 2008-01-20 19:45

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by Scot »

SuperTimo wrote:more AT missiles!!!!

i think BMP-3 is more realistic than the BTR-90. also imho muttrah should have a T-90, as in the city enviroment it can work well if used correctly but is still very vunerable to the cobra and AT missiles. it would just be somthing differnt to hsve on the map.
Noooo!! 1 tank is pointless, so you would need 2 tanks at least, which then leads to unbalance on a huge scale, sorry timo, but i gotta disagree with you there ;)
Image
Howitzer
Posts: 648
Joined: 2008-01-20 17:49

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Post by Howitzer »

The Type-85 on Qwai is already a pain in the where it smells for the US
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”