Page 3 of 3

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Posted: 2008-09-23 15:58
by SuperTimo
more AT missiles!!!!

i think BMP-3 is more realistic than the BTR-90. also imho muttrah should have a T-90, as in the city enviroment it can work well if used correctly but is still very vunerable to the cobra and AT missiles. it would just be somthing differnt to hsve on the map.

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Posted: 2008-09-23 16:51
by Scot
SuperTimo wrote:more AT missiles!!!!

i think BMP-3 is more realistic than the BTR-90. also imho muttrah should have a T-90, as in the city enviroment it can work well if used correctly but is still very vunerable to the cobra and AT missiles. it would just be somthing differnt to hsve on the map.
Noooo!! 1 tank is pointless, so you would need 2 tanks at least, which then leads to unbalance on a huge scale, sorry timo, but i gotta disagree with you there ;)

Re: MEC Vs US APCs - is it based on reality?

Posted: 2008-09-23 19:50
by Howitzer
The Type-85 on Qwai is already a pain in the where it smells for the US