-=TB=-Tobakfromcuba wrote:i take pr serious. i like to do so. having strategical setup, making decisions lead by many factors, having targets and objectives. its like countering all the bad image shooters have.
i face 2 types of players i get mad at.
1. a player just wants a badass gun on his screen and that big is his sense for : teamwork
- i sometimes feel like i should visit them and throw their computer out of the window...
these are times when i wished i had the plastic neck thing where you strangle it, and a mechanical arm on the other players desk, strangles him in the same way.
2. a squaddie is not playing pr for a long time or just isnt good today.
-thats when i cry "idiot" in te mic and feel sry bout that later
my response in bold
and thats the same deal for me, when i play PR i want intense tactical game play. none of this run, and spray, i want to get as close to the battlefield as i can without actually dieing, i want realistic weaponry and proper stats for said weapons, THATS why i play PR, THATS why i hate games like CS where every gun is given a nuclear tip to their bullets, where every man takes 10 bullets to kill, I CHOSE to play PR because i didnt want to see some ZOMG LEET sniper head shoting people with out sighting in while jumping up and down, PR was clearly meant to be serious, it was clearly meant to be something that someone who has seen action can be proud of.
the whole reason i loved PR was because this was a game where most people actually took it seriously enough to act and communicate, and enact disciplins, like a real team.
another point though, i do agree with the people on the whole annoying to do formations thing, i've personally never ordered it, although this one time on basrah my whole squad fanned out into a perfect delta after we set a rally, lol it was totaly random when a SM pointed that out.
LeMazing.
