Project Reality Forums

If there was such a thing as a real arctic warfare map, I'd be all over it .

Since there isn't jungle and trench all the way.

Urban and Desert

Sekh765 wrote:If there was such a thing as a real arctic warfare map, I'd be all over it .

nope, and there's no naval maps too so dunno why they are in the list

Seems like someone tried to create a snowstorm a year back:

Urban for infantry

Jungle for vehicles

Urban and woodland. Urban maps are great for tactical infsquads, while woodland ones are... I dunno, they simply have a great atmosphere.

Saarna wrote: Earlier tonight I was actually wondering out aloud, why on Earth is Kashan so popular. [...]

Man, I couldn't agree more! Kashan is waaay to boring sometimes. At least it will look better with the changes in .85...

Agree. I don't prefer Kashan at all.

What about naval maps? I have a few clan members who are ex U.S. Navy and agree that Naval maps would appeal to quite a few players. Mind you, it doesn't have to be full naval combat engagement with just a patch of ocean as the map. It could be one or two ships providing artillery support or something but we're probably running into engine limitations again...

Remember the battleship in BF1942? Something like that would be very interesting...

urban and woodland, but vehicles on both


and desmo ships have been asked for about as many times as fastr0pez have

Tartantyco wrote:-You know what touché means, right?

My bad I thought you said touchy...Late nights finishing PR has fried my brain

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:nope, and there's no naval maps too so dunno why they are in the list

Ahhhh why not

Jungle
Woodland
Urban

Also, Mao Valley.

Mao Valley!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YouTube - Guns n Roses Welcome to the Jungle need i say more ?

if it moves blast it, if it screams balst it again !

I smiled when I read the topic. PR is a fun game but if you will have to pay for it I think it will lose alot of players. Pr is just not that popular either, And ive already payed for Battlefield2. Sorry.

alvina wrote:I smiled when I read the topic. PR is a fun game but if you will have to pay for it I think it will lose alot of players. Pr is just not that popular either, And ive already payed for Battlefield2. Sorry.

Wrong thread, mayb? Oh, and when people post "How much would you pay?" threads, they'll just for fun, never serious, and only if PR got 1337Fastropes off Blackhawks

by maps:

1.Desert
2.Urban (If you add Hallelujah West)
3.Jungle

Woodland + Urban + Mountain

I would have put desert warfare, but I really don't prefer open flat maps. I'd rather play on mountainous maps like Korengal Valley, Urban maps like Ramiel, and Woodland maps like Fools Road.

Urban maps all the way, There's no feeling quite like walking down the streets knowing that somewhere around a corner, there's a bullet with your name on it.

Now we just need a reason for the factions to fight in Arctic conditions and then we got ARCTIC WARFARE! (which may I point out got 20% of votes.....)

I would like to see a Urban/City/Desert map A map with a small Urban outlay all around it and a huge City but a Major dust storm has hit and its covered in Desert on the roads etc

USA vs INS.

I'd make it my self but I cant lol