Posted: 2006-05-17 17:32
*Lays down anti flame spray!!*
Guys just chill out a bit.
There are arguments on both sides.
Just to preempt them, the anti-reasons for war - can point to the fact that the US and British Gov't have had to walk back prewar statements, and have been exposed as having 'sexed up' reports on Saddam.
And those who are pro can say that WMDs HAVE been found in Iraq, and plus they must have been there as the US sold them to Saddam.
In short you can both argue till blue in the face and not win!
Lets just leave it as a disagreement and accept the war as a fait accompli and look to the future not the past
Guys just chill out a bit.
There are arguments on both sides.
Just to preempt them, the anti-reasons for war - can point to the fact that the US and British Gov't have had to walk back prewar statements, and have been exposed as having 'sexed up' reports on Saddam.
And those who are pro can say that WMDs HAVE been found in Iraq, and plus they must have been there as the US sold them to Saddam.
In short you can both argue till blue in the face and not win!
Lets just leave it as a disagreement and accept the war as a fait accompli and look to the future not the past