Page 3 of 30

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-10 13:50
by supahpingi
RedWater wrote: The only thing I absolutly HATE is beeing shot at ... sometimes I feel like the Blues as doing it for porpose just hurting me and not killing ... its so damn annoying if get hit once (you havent even an idea from where which is annoying as well) and you have to bleed to death slowly cuz noone takes ever Civi, and even if theres a Civi is on the other side of the map.
wait,you play a shooter and hate getting shot at?

:S

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-10 15:44
by Alex6714
Always Blufor, since the last couple of versions, before that insurgents rocked.

Unless its karbala, in which case the best option is probably insurgents, where you can do a bit of RPG/SA7 spam and watch the comments on chat.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-10 16:07
by Masterbake
Fallujah - Main road IEDs go boom. Happy times...

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-10 16:24
by freeway
b4 i know how to use the lee enfield proper i used to like blufor but after that insergents is tha best , it is fun blowing shit up and for the love of the lee enfield
Korengal = rape us main with the lee enfield is fun
Archer is the best , and again the lee enfield rules this map .
Kabala it is a shame the lee is not in this map , just damn
cant wait till next update when the medic class is fixed , they for the first time can be killed , hate it when u try so much to headshot a guy at 600 meters with the lee then here come a medic revives that guy . oh btw in next update the lee is going to use it's own bullet ? i dont realy know what is a difference between the 2 bullets ? is it gonna be 1 shot kill or is it gonna go faster ?

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-10 17:06
by hiberNative
BLUFOR, but not by much.
it's fun to fly helicopters. it's fun to drive or work next to armor.

but i do love insurgents/taliban too due to the fun and variated weapons. shame is that the teamwork is kind of lacking cause forces are spread out over caches. looking forward to .86 where there'll only be 2 exposed caches at a time. will hopefully concentrate the opfor a bit more.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-10 18:56
by Ome99
I would go with the insurgents, i specialy like korengal valley, the terrain really tips the favor to the taliban, plus the fact that taliban get to request kits unlike other insurgetns, and for some reason i find people on insurgents/taliban side on this map to wprk much more co-ordinated than other insurgency maps.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-10 21:59
by TheLean
If i want to be a lonewolf ninja prefer insurgents.

If i want to have good teamwork i prefer coalition.

I prefer both, some days I prefer not to use VOIP and then insurgents are great, other times I want squad cohesive teamwork and then coalition is awesome.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-10 22:10
by jim1994
Fallujah - either
Archer - US
Basrah - insurgents
Korengal - either
Ramiel - Insurgents
Karbala - Insurgents

I like both mostly :P

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-11 02:28
by JuniperM40
Insurgency FTW

- JM40.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-11 02:33
by Spartan0189
Honestly, I'm fine with both sides, But I usually prefer the BLUFOR side, as for they have a better advantage, but the Insurgent side has more advantages, such as their traps, and their shotty.

BLUFOR still.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-11 05:14
by Lt.Blackmore
I gotta be the British or the US, I just can't stand the AK it makes me so angry,its such an ugly(but good) gun and used way to much in games we need more uncommon guns in games like F88s and L85s and so on.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-11 05:24
by Airsoft
If i play with a good team on Basra, then armor is the best option for me. Other than that, the average pub teamwork I like to stick with insurgents. Organized 6 man collaborator squads are most fun since we don't have to worry about spawn times, by revivng each other.

And if not a collaborator, the AK is a pretty deadly weapon in close range. Just gotta make the coalition come to you ;)

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-11 07:13
by SocketMan
Playing as insurgent was a lot more fun (for me) when you could strap a C4's on a car,kill a Humvee with 1 RPG,get a nice (scoped m82 for example) pick up kit,drive the "old school" bike - which allowed to look around for the driver, and to fire a weapon for the passenger,not having to wear a huge pink "kill me" sign on your head (turban) - no matter what kit.

Anyway I play both sides,just don't think the "balance of power" is balanced :razz:
Don't get me wrong -not saying you can't win as Ins,it's just it's a lot less "fun" then
it used to be.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-11 07:55
by cyberzomby
Yea Im missing the both option 2. Its just really fun when you got an organised insurgent squad and you go toe to toe with the US.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-11 09:11
by wookimonsta
i actually enjoy both if I have a good squad, but when I dont have that, I prefer insurgents. A lone insurgent can do more damage than a lone soldier. I usually grab a sapper kit and lay ambushed and the like.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-11 10:20
by Juanxz
British and US Forces when possible. I can understand the commo rose and therefore know what they are saying. I can't understand chinese or arabic.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-11 12:41
by synch c
I prefer BLUE in all except for korengal and fallujah for one simple reason; if you are doing your job as INS then you're defending the caches in some way and defending a cache that isn't being attacked is boring. Reducing the revealed cache maximum from three to two should go some way to alleviating this problem though.

The method for marking mines really doesn't help the INS cause either.

As for all the people complaining about Basrah being an armour siege I feel this could be adressed by sorting out the crippling spawn time on the collaborator. In my opinion this is the very worst restriction option available. A one hundred and twenty second spawn time is almost as annoying and deflating as being kicked from the server. And for what? Playing a medic with stones for a main weapon. I've been thinking about this alot and will start a thread on suggestions if one doesn't already exist.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-11 12:46
by SkaterCrush
I pretty much always go BLUFOR, I love hunting down caches and no scopes for insurgents gets annoying a lot.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-11 13:29
by Rissien
Depends on the map, Korengal I like to go Ins, the rest I prefer BLUFOR but unlike some people I dont swap sides all the time. If i happen to be Ins for the round il go along with it and happily destroy the BLUFOR.

Re: Which side do you prefer on Insurgency?

Posted: 2009-06-11 13:41
by Scandicci
Blufor, all the way. When we were kids we had to take turns being the cowboys, but somebody had to be the indians. Now, that is not very PC but I was a child in the 70s. For me it is not about being the good guy, it is just that the vast majority of times, in my experience as a casual pubber, the Taliban/Insurgency team throws out teamwork, strategy and tactics. Folks tend to lonewolf, ignore orders, fire weapons into the air randomly, etc. To be fair I have had some great rounds as the 'bad guys' but it is only on those rare occasions when the squad works together and avoids engaging in a collective session of grab *** and similar antics.



Peace out.