Posted: 2006-05-21 17:39
You don't? I do. Mondays, tuesdays and every second friday. The rest of the days I play submarine.....PvtJackson wrote:Does it really matter what something looks like? You don't bed down a chopper.
You don't? I do. Mondays, tuesdays and every second friday. The rest of the days I play submarine.....PvtJackson wrote:Does it really matter what something looks like? You don't bed down a chopper.
The Sikorsky S-80 is the CH-53E Super Stallion / MH-53E Sea Dragon, the Marine Corps and Navy heavy lift helicopter. The Merlin is a medium lift helicopter and is quite a bit smaller. You are correct that the Vertol 107 is the Sea Knight, though.G.Drew wrote:doesnt some of them look familiar?
S-80 - Merlin?
Vertol 107 - Sea knight
The days of the CH-46E are numbered; they long ago started to become deathtraps and horror stories abound from the Marines that ride in them. One of our military advisors said that you should not get in a CH-46 if it isn't leaking fluids, since that meant that there were no more fluids. He also described some of the bird he flew in as having patched bullet strikes from Vietnam since the airframes were that old. The story he told that stands out most in my mind is a crew chief grabbing a rifleman and telling him to "pump this (backup hydraulic system), or we fucking die!"Dark Ewok wrote:To each his own. Personally I prefer the look of the Vertol 107. I think it looks tons cooler than the CH47. Plus with the current problem of the number of seats available in game, the smaller Vertol might be a more logical choice.
Eddie baker, do you know anything about the status on making more than 6 seats available in helis? Or any other solution, for that matter.'[R-DEV wrote:Eddie Baker']The Sikorsky S-80 is the CH-53E Super Stallion / MH-53E Sea Dragon, the Marine Corps and Navy heavy lift helicopter. The Merlin is a medium lift helicopter and is quite a bit smaller. You are correct that the Vertol 107 is the Sea Knight, though.
The days of the CH-46E are numbered; they long ago started to become deathtraps and horror stories abound from the Marines that ride in them. One of our military advisors said that you should not get in a CH-46 if it isn't leaking fluids, since that meant that there were no more fluids. He also described some of the bird he flew in as having patched bullet strikes from Vietnam since the airframes were that old. The story he told that stands out most in my mind is a crew chief grabbing a rifleman and telling him to "pump this (backup hydraulic system), or we fucking die!"![]()
The Marine Corps will be replacing them starting this summer with the MV-22 Osprey, when the first Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron, the Thunderchickens, will activate. The Navy has mostly replaced its CH-46s with the C/MH-60S Knighthawk.
And also, if we model the CH-47 Chinook, we can make multiple skins and use it for both the RAF and US Army. And slightly remodel it into a 160th SOAR MH-47E.
BLASPHEMY! It's the UH-1N that's the old one. UH-1Y is the new one. both are the most beautiful birds in the sky. Oh, research my sig and you'll find out why I say this.Top _Cat the great wrote:Please no UH-1y huey - i hate them , so old, and old and ugly and old.

I haven't really read up on the subject but as I understand it, the 6 passenger limit is a constraint in the BF2 code and not in the PRMM code, and is nothing that can be changed right? In that case, I absolutely agree.Armand61685 wrote:i dont see the point of adding new helicopters if they can only hold 6 people. It would be a waste of time and effort.