Project Reality Forums

I expect same good game! And I want that the game would get only good updates

well we've been promised some MBT overhauls for .9/patches...

also hope IDF or Germans can make it by then (as they are the closest to being done)

this thread is going well guys thnaks for your responses i wonder if the DEVs will read this and give us some information on how some of these things are comming along

More maps, night maps, morning maps, dawn maps, rainy maps, foggy maps, rainy foggy maps, foggy night mapy, foggy dawn maps, night day maps, oh well.

And tweaks on weapons other than LMG.

The only thing I "expect" from the DEV team, is another great patch. But one thing I would like to see, and I don't know if it's been mentioned before, is an update to the Insurgent maps. With the withdrawal of British Forces from Iraq and the pullback of US forces from the Major cities, why not have an Iraqi army faction take over fighting the Insurgents? Give them American Camouflage and a mix of Russian and US weapons, ie a Rifleman with an M-16 or an Ak-47.

Just my thoughts.

the new maps


and new layers for existing maps, for AAS i want to have the option of at least 16, 32, 64 and 128


and for some maps maybe a 256 "extended" layer with alot of tickets and the assests of the 64 "standard" layer



Edit::: misread the title, thats my wishes none the less

what i expect for .9 is a better installment and evolution of what PR currently is. What everyone here is doing is suggesting and requesting. We all expect a fun game that keeps us immersed in the tactical atmosphere, nothing less. The dev's do that, let em work.

HughJass wrote:well we've been promised some MBT overhauls for .9/patches...

you got a link for that?

I want a new MBT System Implemented. look at Combined Arms FLIR System. Just amazing

A vista fix.

Sangin, MK19, the Abrams W/ TUSK, New humvee, maybe the new PLA tank, scopes for the MGs that dont have the model

Psykogundam wrote:you got a link for that?

T-72M1M (As well as other MBT hints)
Tank system overhaul(And another hint at the PLA MBT)




What I'm hoping for is for a complete air asset revival, and the porting of around 50 % of the work done in CA. Whether we can expect that is entirely up to the Devs, however.

McLuv wrote:T-72M1M (As well as other MBT hints)
Tank system overhaul(And another hint at the PLA MBT)




What I'm hoping for is for a complete air asset revival, and the porting of around 50 % of the work done in CA. Whether we can expect that is entirely up to the Devs, however.

you forgot this!!

https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f388-c ... k-wip.html

Integrated mumble. More big maps. More Brit maps.

-Chinook.

-And a new grenade from the PLA forces.

Id like to see spec ops kits brought back with a silenced m4 , no c4 , some mines and motion detector which displays enemy positions nearby it on the map.max of 3 per team so we can have spec ops squads.

But we should call those kits "Splinter Cells" and give them some sticky cameras

Expect:
regard something as probable or likely; "The meteorologists are expecting rain for tomorrow"
Demand:
necessitate: require as useful, due, just, or proper; "The bank demanded payment of the loan"


Theres a world of difference, expecting something doesn't imply making any demands of the developers.
If I expect the Bundeswehr to make it into 0.9 that just means that at the current rate they're going forward with the development, I find it highly likely that it will be done by the time 0.9 gets here.

Vista (64bit) fix since every 2nd time a map change occus i get crashes back to desktop.

Bring back the spec ops kit i want a SOPMOD m4.....

i hope that there will be IDF