Page 3 of 4
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-19 22:34
by Chuc
Also they're not going to be totally locked away from the community, we have a plan that I think everyone will love

Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-19 23:48
by LudacrisKill
As much as maps like Ejod and Sunset City are fun. They are not 'PR maps'.
There is a difference between having maps that suit PR and having maps that are fun.
If it was all about fun I would want a 1km x 1km map with a massive crater in the middle and 16 TOW humvvs on both sides. Instant respawn on hmmvs and everyone jst driving around in the pit...
(when I told that idea to a clan mate he paused and said... 'well im glad youre not a DEV')
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-19 23:52
by abbadon101
All I can say is if anyone touches Muttrah, I will personally track them down and feed them to a horde of ravenous kittens.
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 04:47
by Outlawz7
LOL, I never had a post that triggered a domino effect over 4 pages...
LudacrisKill wrote:As much as maps like Ejod and Sunset City are fun. They are not 'PR maps'.
No, they are PR maps, both Sunset and Ejod were made especially for PR in 0.3 and 0.4, but we are at 0.87/0.9 now and their design no longer fits the current gameplay and last I checked, people started hating Sunset after 0.75 anyway.
abbadon101 wrote:All I can say is if anyone touches Muttrah, I will personally track them down and feed them to a horde of ravenous kittens.
Don't worry, Muttrah won't go away.
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 05:31
by Truism
Thank god, Kufrah is gone.
I always wanted to remake it as an infantry map, because the oilfields were so cool, but it was just a nightmare to play.
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 05:48
by chuckMFd
I'm glad those maps are getting removed! That way people can only play the new epic maps and together!!
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 06:49
by Kain888
[R-CON]Outlawz wrote:Don't worry, Muttrah won't go away.
I would prefer Muttrah to be removed than Jabal.

Jabal is one of the best maps of AAS mode.
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 10:22
by Nebsif
Sunset is one of my favorite maps, not every1 likes huge maps, kthnx.
Most of the time im playing on infantry maps (no vehicles), EJOD 16 ftw!
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 14:40
by LeChuckle
7gayes
kufrah
bi ming
karbala
'ni
t sae
s city
?
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 14:45
by JacktheStripper
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 15:21
by John-117
could you please give us a complete list then a poll? i just want to know. also will these maps be fully playable in prsp? will there be a map that is for britain with jets and tanks etc?
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 16:06
by =(DK)=stoffen_tacticalsup
This thread is not about WHICH maps are going to be removed, but about what maps we can expect in 0.9
If your favorite map is not in that list, have a rant somewhere else.
This is just so that we may get an overview as to what to expect mapwise!
The core of the thread is to find out, if there is going to be a sigfinicant increase in the (new) amount of maps. That was the personal goal from my part, the reason being, that I am fed up with playing the same maps over and over. Havent played PR in 2 months due to lack of variety.
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 16:38
by John-117
ah ok ..
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 17:02
by burghUK
Removing another british map?
If your going to remove any maps take out every chinese one. But for the love of god don't take out 7 gates and Ejod.
If sangins not in the next release i may die a little inside.
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 17:28
by Tannhauser
Rather than whine about maps, why don't you people make ''better'' v2 versions of em' so they get included?
Seriously, if a map is outdated, it should be dumped in favor of a more fitting map. There are the retro map packs anyway, if you still want to play them.
BTW, who cares about file size? It's not filesize, it's wether the map is worth being in the game or not.
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 17:29
by Rudd
But for the love of god don't take out 7 gates
lets be fair, 7 gates really isn't great. But the CA effects really make it worth playing. These old maps can live on, but only with new innovations - e.g. sandstorms, rain etc
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 17:32
by Hresvelgr
crAck_sh0t wrote:Removing another british map?
If your going to remove any maps take out every chinese one. But for the love of god don't take out 7 gates and Ejod.
If sangins not in the next release i may die a little inside.
I actually rather enjoy playing as the Chinese. They're my favorite faction! I just hope Sunset City stays, and that they won't get as screwed as the Russians are going to be, seeing how the Russians are losing most of the few maps they have to the British I've heard. Shame, considering the Russians are my second-favorites.
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 17:35
by Rudd
seeing how the Russians are losing most of the few maps they have to the British I've heard
I love unsubstantiated rumours, so much fun! Did you hear that the molovov is getting reskinned to a vodka bottle and what the DEVs wanted to do is right click to drink and left click to throw the bottle at the MPs trying to put you in the drunk tank- ofc there is incredible deviation associated with that.
Re: [Question] Maps & 0.9
Posted: 2009-10-20 17:46
by driver-ch-driver
Dr2B Rudd wrote:I love unsubstantiated rumours, so much fun! Did you hear that the molovov is getting reskinned to a vodka bottle and what the DEVs wanted to do is right click to drink and left click to throw the bottle at the MPs trying to put you in the drunk tank- ofc there is incredible deviation associated with that.

Awesome!
Yes I know...