Project Reality Forums

Looks great.
I can run Arma 2 on low graphics, I don't think I can run PR:Arma2 at all I serious doubt that I could run OA either. But hey there is always a good chance I'll be getting a new desktop next year for graduation, and it will be a mega computer
So don't worry Arma2 R I will play you!

This looks awesome, great work for sure.

Thanks.

Blud

i really hope pr arma will be more than "just another arma2 mod"

Duckmeister wrote:So, what's the Project Reality team going to do about the recently announced British Forces $10 DLC coming out at the end of this month? Using it? Not, and going with your own models of the same items? Asking BIS to stop splitting the community with every new piece of content?

And what happened to that desert map you guys were using before OA? That would've been great!

Remember we have 3 more News posts to go

Protector wrote:Well then bump your post count else where... If you won't buy AO we don't actually care... we are all here to enjoy the highlights and talk about how good PR arma looks.

You should care, because you're losing players that way.

It's not that I don't WANT to buy AO, I just don't have the money.

Excavus wrote:You should care, because you're losing players that way.

It's not that I don't WANT to buy AO, I just don't have the money.

There is actually far more players on OA then Reg ArmA 2 so they aren't losing much.

Kinda gay that it requires original Arma 2, Seriously I bought OA for PR and now i have to puurchase again?! Thats BS man.

Urbanxfx wrote:Kinda gay that it requires original Arma 2, Seriously I bought OA for PR and now i have to puurchase again?! Thats BS man.

Why on earth would you NOT buy Combined Operations? It's only $10 more to get both, now you have to spend another $50.

At first I was like YEEEES! 0.92! But then I read it.Great work anyway looks awesome.

This update made me happy.

haha im glad i have both although i did buy em separately lol

Duckmeister wrote:Why on earth would you NOT buy Combined Operations? It's only $10 more to get both, now you have to spend another $50.

I tried to buy Combined Operation with my $50 prepaid card but the final price+GST was like 53$ and the card on had $50 so i had to buy OA only.

Urbanxfx wrote:I tried to buy Combined Operation with my $50 prepaid card but the final price+GST was like 53$ and the card on had $50 so i had to buy OA only.

Are you saying you couldn't simply go and pay the extra three dollars?
You know they have Combined Operations in stores...

I had a prepaid mastercard with a maximum price of $50 so i couldn't pay that, i bought from steam.

Amazing stuff. i will play it mostly for sure.

Not using both would be a waste, for PR and for people who bought 'the wrong one'.

Fighter wrote:I think I'll just wait another 6 months for BIS to release another expansion pack that PR will develop on, so I don't waste my money that I don't have on OA. :/

PR would probably still be using Combined Arms even if they adopted a 2nd expansion pack.

Fighter wrote:Extremely disappointed about the move to OA.

How can you be disappointed about a ton of additional content as well as engine improvements?

Urbanxfx wrote:Kinda gay that it requires original Arma 2, Seriously I bought OA for PR and now i have to puurchase again?! Thats BS man.

Unfortunately you only have yourself to blame... no one has ever said that Arma2 was not required.. how you came to that conclusion is beyond me. I'd have thought its requirement was obvious.

The requirement of OA was the only issue that needed resolving. PR using it is a great move.. i personally didn't want to buy any addons for Amra2.. but AO is a great improvement, no regrets.

Great, now I have to buy OA. Should be worth it though, as I would hate to miss out on doing this



Clifftop insertion=Awesomeness.

looking good, hope this will make arma a good pvp game...

I feel I need to make things a little clear here, as it seems a few of the community are not happy with our decision.

Not that we have to explain our reasons, however I do think the community should get a response.

We announced we would be initially working on ArmA2 some time ago to inform the community.

Some 4 months or so later we have now announced we will be taking advantage of OA too.

As a Mod team we would be stupid not to make that call, the extra content, is like adding a whole new game, not to mention the performance improvement, the whole ArmA2 community are using it, the desert add ons, etc etc.

OA alone would be a bad move, as it more than halves the content available to us.

We have worked on ArmA2 for some time and currently have certain missions running on ArmA2 still, which will be used.

However for people to go out and buy OA without ArmA2 - is not our fault, we clearly stated ArmA2 a while ago, and have since added OA to it, not the other way around !!

ArmA2 alone provides us with:

# United States Marine Corps
# Armed forces of the Russian Federation
# Chernarussian Defence Forces "CDF"
# Chernarussian Movement of the Red Star "ChDKZ"
# National Party "NAPA"
# Citizens of Chernarus


OA addition now gives us the following to add to that list:

* United States Army
* Takistani Army
* NATO and UNO
* Takistani Locals




I suggest if you are concerned you should look here for 5 mins, and see why we made that call:


ArmA2 Full feature list (2263 add ons)

ArmAII/ArmAII :O A library of available equipment and objects - Hosted by Armaholic.com


Operation Arrowhead Full Feature List (732 add ons)

ArmAII/ArmAII :O A library of available equipment and objects - Hosted by Armaholic.com


Why would anyone get rid of ArmA2, especially a Mod Team





UKF