Project Reality Forums

Dev1200 wrote:They already tested it, and it was immensely boring and repetitive.

It was actually the opposite, but oh well...

NyteMyre wrote: - Counter attack mode (where defending forces start under equipped and get reinforcements after a while)
- Push mode (or whatever the name is, where there were the flags can't be recaptured)

that was counter-attack. the flags became cappable again after some time.

i would like to see the old fob system back! bunkers ftw!!!!!!!!

Assault on Mestia and OGT.


Loved those two so much, great CQB combat and something that I feel is sadly missing from PR nowadays, there is nothing wrong with fast paced close quarter infantry fighting and it just isn't possible on 4km maps most of the time.

[R-MOD]Jigsaw wrote:Assault on Mestia and OGT.


Loved those two so much, great CQB combat and something that I feel is sadly missing from PR nowadays, there is nothing wrong with fast paced close quarter infantry fighting and it just isn't possible on 4km maps most of the time.

This.


And as some people said before... Nostalgia about the old rally system... Of course it was a little weird since you could turn any hut into an army teleport center... But I miss go rally hunting... So satisfying when you actually found a rally (before it simply got overun, just unspawnable...)

[R-MOD]BloodBane611 wrote:Agreed. Zatar was awesome, though the fact that the T-72s could rape the LHD from the last flag was a bit of an issue

Still, when I first joined that was the map that I loved playing the most in PR, was epic fun.

Dome of Death FTW? Or could the US rape the tanks with attack hueys and Cobras?

Steel Thunder, OGT, Mao Valley and infantry maps

id say zatar would be great with some heavy Asymetry now.

US versus lets say, china (just to be different) US's main weapon of choice is the A-10. cobra would be just like muttrah and thats got it's own thing. throw down some new statics like trees and some enterable buildings on the parts of the map that are baldy and make it a dusk map. i'd probibly not have the pipelines. they were really enoying. thats what ruined al kufra oilfields imo.

inf with A-10 support versus Inf with ZPUs.

barracuda has the sun in the carrier's direction, this time for a change have the sun in the invader's eyes coming from south west. and throw down some walls and stuff to make cool firefights accros the marshes.

i think you could revamp zatar quite well. would be better off doing it from scratch. 4k map, little bit of ocean and lots of marshland. great lasing map. but i wouldnt help people build stuff up on the airfield mountains, that was very annoying and it ruins the emmersion.

Assault on Mestia, as said before, it was an awesome map.

Spec ops Kit

Planes on insurgency

[R-MOD]Jigsaw wrote:Assault on Mestia and OGT.


Loved those two so much, great CQB combat and something that I feel is sadly missing from PR nowadays, there is nothing wrong with fast paced close quarter infantry fighting and it just isn't possible on 4km maps most of the time.

-Deadly headshot.
-Unguided HAT for every faction.
-Assault on Mestia
-SS-18 Satan on Silent Eagle

CareBear wrote:with militia officer kit??

completly agree

And the Bizon, so underestimated.

Not to forget the epic tower bases either.

Brits vs MEC on Asad would be epic

I want to see the tank back in Fllujah west. And the merlin on basrah.

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:hehe, we always remember the old versions to be better than they really where

If you played it again now, even with a full server etc it wouldn't be anything like as good as you remember

That may be true that I am a bit nostalgic, but I think I would still stand by my words. I think it is safe to say this stuff in public as I am no longer wearing tags...

***Disclaimer: Warning the following text contains personal opinions and should not be viewed as a statement from the Project Reality team. Also don't do drugs or kill hookers***

[nostalgic]
Personally I am much more of a tactical gamer, not a simulator player.

By tactical I mean games such as Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six ect. Where it can be a bit fast paced and what really determines your experience is your skill with a weapon and utilizing it correctly + teamwork of course.

In my honest opinion PR was like this when I started out playing and hobby modding for it, but over the years people (developers and gamers alike) wanted realism, "because it is used IRL" is often the argument and not really about game play. Thus turning PR from tactical "fun" (in my book) game play in to a simulator basically.

Now current day PR is still one of my favorites, don't get me wrong here, but my personal preference is just more in another genre. Hence my argument.

Then PR was more fast paced game play in a plausible realistic, (perhaps a little stylized/representive environment/setting) where now it is slow paced and so detail focused that I hardly know how to use all of the functions in the game - and I was a developer for pete's sake

Just my opinion, PR can still encompass this game play I speak of, but just not as frequently, but I still play when my computer and time allows me to

[/nostalgic]

Heli on Basrah
Auto lock bombs
Ability/option to fire all your hellfires within 2 seconds

Z-trooper wrote:That may be true that I am a bit nostalgic, but I think I would still stand by my words. I think it is safe to say this stuff in public as I am no longer wearing tags...

***Disclaimer: Warning the following text contains personal opinions and should not be viewed as a statement from the Project Reality team. Also don't do drugs or kill hookers***

[nostalgic]
Personally I am much more of a tactical gamer, not a simulator player.

By tactical I mean games such as Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six ect. Where it can be a bit fast paced and what really determines your experience is your skill with a weapon and utilizing it correctly + teamwork of course.

In my honest opinion PR was like this when I started out playing and hobby modding for it, but over the years people (developers and gamers alike) wanted realism, "because it is used IRL" is often the argument and not really about game play. Thus turning PR from tactical "fun" (in my book) game play in to a simulator basically.

Now current day PR is still one of my favorites, don't get me wrong here, but my personal preference is just more in another genre. Hence my argument.

Then PR was more fast paced game play in a plausible realistic, (perhaps a little stylized/representive environment/setting) where now it is slow paced and so detail focused that I hardly know how to use all of the functions in the game - and I was a developer for pete's sake

Just my opinion, PR can still encompass this game play I speak of, but just not as frequently, but I still play when my computer and time allows me to

[/nostalgic]

BLASPHEMY!!! KILL THE HERETIC!!! (and with that I mean the hooker part)

Z-trooper wrote: ***Disclaimer: Warning the following text contains personal opinions and should not be viewed as a statement from the Project Reality team. Also don't do drugs or kill hookers***

Is it true that the PR developers must have a hooker and drug dealer on speed dial? Also where does all of the donation money go *shines lights in eyes* we know that this whole up keeping site stuff is rubbish. Where does it go *begins slapping him*

Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.Molotovs.

EJOD Desert!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mestia and 7 gates! They were my favorite maps. I loved setting up ambushes on Mestia and having my whole squad open fire at once. Also getting ambushed and trying to run for cover and regroup could be exciting. I wonder how these map would play now that we have mortars though. It would make defending any of the outposts really difficult.