No good IDF maps

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Web_cole
Posts: 1324
Joined: 2010-03-07 09:51

Re: No good IDF maps

Post by Web_cole »

Discussing maps is like discussing music; sure you can probably compare complexity of arrangement and technique and what not, but it mostly comes down to what you like. It is subjective; it differs from person to person.

So personally, I really like Beirut (I think its very well made from both a gameplay and an aesthetic perspective), I like Gaza (but I recognise it may not be a good map, or at least has some serious issues) I like Asad if played infrequently (it always plays out the same way(s)), and I dislike Iron Eagle (too few flags in too large a space, often plays out slow and awkwardly).

Maybe the OP has half a point, but at least the IDF has 4 maps, whereas the Germans only have 2 (and altogether arguably a "worse" lot than the IDF maps.) The same could be said of the Canucks, I'd prefer to see both of those factions get some new maps before the IDF.
ImageImageImageImage
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”