Project Reality Forums

I Remember that i took out 3 caches (+2 Hideouts and 1 AA and 1 RPG) lonewolfing on Kokan as a US scout. So the same could be also said for the BLUfor.

Now-a-days, I only want to be insurgent. I love driving around the ammo techie. I always offer to drop ammo but people are rarely willing to ask for it or even answer when I ask who needs ammo.

Strange...

Join taliban!
and lets ride in a car, with gunner, and drive by shoot'em all marine boys!!
Allahhhh!!!! lol
I love drive by

I only like Insurgency on the "Insurgent" side when i can play as the Taliban, otherwise it's Bluefor for me.

Everybody knows its fun to make the blufor side run into a remote detonated IED

But they hate the 30 minute wait until someone actually goes there

PKM and SVD both cut through Blufor troops so easily that I enjoy being insurgent way more than those fancy "we-got-optics" guys. And AK easily dominates those pathetic 5.56 rounds if you just let them come closer

Coalition because every single time I play as the Insurgent force nobody seems to be working together and taking the term 'Jihad' too far by running off by themselves. I cannot remember a single match where this has not happened with me playing Insurgents and has just led to me leaving the match if I can't get on the Coalition.

Lately, I prefer Insurgency.

I was on the ]TAR[ server last night and we had one cache locked down like fort knox, it was crazy fun trying to hold it as more and more infidels tried to weasel their way in.

New to the game -- bought BF2 specifically for PR, but I'll definitely be going back to that server. Lots of teamwork, lots of fun.

Insurgents because they are most on the defense, which is my preferred play-style, -plus I played conventional forces for years - tend to get a bit boring in the long run.

In X years from now, Insurgents will be boring, so then it will be back to the conventional forces again. Nice with the diversity.

Coalition has better teamwork and I like the compound cleaning, but being an Insurgent every kill is a big achievement. You know you have much less of a chance so when you kill a few bluefor with a good ambush you feel like the ultimate ninja warrior.

INS - because is easier to play if ur team is a fail.

Rezza wrote:I Remember that i took out 3 caches (+2 Hideouts and 1 AA and 1 RPG) lonewolfing on Kokan as a US scout. So the same could be also said for the BLUfor.

3 caches? how? CE?

I'd love to say Insurgent, I really would.

But Coalition is just more fun in nearly every way.

Blufor is more fun is more fun since as insurgent you can only play deffensively and wait the blufor to come

narref wrote:Blufor is more fun is more fun since as insurgent you can only play deffensively and wait the blufor to come

I think you are wrong there in the first phase of the round you will have to defend but as soon as the BLUFOR starts setting up FOBs and Mortar Positions you can start attacking those choke points.

simple really, blu for have all the toys, and insurgents have rocks? hmm

vishuddaxxx wrote:simple really, blu for have all the toys, and insurgents have rocks? hmm

It is a big challenge to kill people with rocks, but when you have finally killed someone you will get much more satisfied than killing 50 Insurgents with an Abrahams.

Fallujah=US
Basrah= Brits
Karbala= "Daewi disconnected from the server"
Archer= US
Korengal= Both
Ramiel= US

I think I mostly prefer Bluefor because of the lack of teamplay on the Insurgent side. Many players take a sniper/RPG, and goes "Happy hunting people". Of course I have had some epic rounds on Insurgents' side too and I don't switch teams just because the server placed mme withe Insurgents.

Insurgents... i like ambushs...

I prefer the BLUFOR because I have more assets available to me.

USMC scout sniper wrote:I prefer the BLUFOR because I have more assets available to me.

Well Insurgents also have assets, but not everyone considers them as Assets, even the server admins.....but if they are treaded and considered as assets you will be as effective as an APC.