Re: To: PR:BF2 admins
Posted: 2011-10-08 15:10
Uhm, okay? What you wanted was everyone to agree with you. Almost no one did.SmoothIsFast6 wrote:i got exactly whatever i wanted![]()
Uhm, okay? What you wanted was everyone to agree with you. Almost no one did.SmoothIsFast6 wrote:i got exactly whatever i wanted![]()
It still relies on the admins wanting to do it. No offence web, as the prta server with forced mumble was awesome, but what happend? Please don't take that the wrong way. Was forcing mumble and having admins taking time out to do it lead to them not being arsed playing as they was spending more time admining mumble.Web_cole wrote:I on the other hand have some reasonable experience of itHaving been in charge of PRTA from about when it launched (mid - late 2010, I forget) to something like 5/6 months down the line I would say I'm qualified to comment on it. And obviously your right, its a *****. Admining a server anyway is a lot of work, if you add to that the task of keeping a server to 100% mumblers that is a LOT of extra work.
And most of the points you made earlier are good ones; it is kind of a **** move to kick someone after they've helped seed your server, dual screens is almost a necessity(not quite bit it really helps), and it does take it out of your admins.
But, here's the thing; we did it for half a year, with average administration, bad infrastructure ( <-- both my fault) and a rather small (but dedicated) admin team PRTA was, for a brief time, the best server in PR (not that I'm biased)
That's what 100% mumble will do for you.
Now I listed some of our problems, and some of the reasons why things didn't work out so great in the end, and here is the point I'm trying to make: NwA could do it if they wanted to. With an admin team capable of running 2 servers, a good solid organisational structure already in place and as Ploddit said something like a 75% mumble population I think if you guys wanted to you could do it and you could do it right.
Even just enforcing SLs on mumble SL radio can be a significant step up in organisation and teamwork.![]()
Like I say, I think a large and well organised admin team could manage it well. But your right it still relies on admins wanting to do it.*NwA*Orford wrote:It still relies on the admins wanting to do it. No offence web, as the prta server with forced mumble was awesome, but what happend? Please don't take that the wrong way. Was forcing mumble and having admins taking time out to do it lead to them not being arsed playing as they was spending more time admining mumble.
I kinda think it might have done, or be close to it. Its obviously not a new idea, but it does seem like what's needed to carry it forward (and convince server admins to support it) is a new, more convenient, bug free, feature rich version.*NwA*Orford wrote: one question that could be thrown at the general player population is. Has PR mumble reached a critical mass.
Cannot wait.Web_cole wrote:Like I say, I think a large and well organised admin team could manage it well. But your right it still relies on admins wanting to do it.
I kinda think it might have done, or be close to it. Its obviously not a new idea, but it does seem like what's needed to carry it forward (and convince server admins to support it) is a new, more convenient, bug free, feature rich version.
almost no one did? i wonder how the ones that did feel about that. Not many responded and no i wasn't looking for a fan club either, plz redirect your poor attitude somewhere elsesaXoni wrote:Uhm, okay? What you wanted was everyone to agree with you. Almost no one did.
I do not have a problem with you personally, so that shouldn't be necessary.SmoothIsFast6 wrote:got a problem with me? e-mail me and we'll go from there
If that's the way it's going to be done, then it's okay. But this wasn't what you wanted people to do. You wanted the admins to enforce Mumble on their servers, which means everyone without Mumble wouldn't be able to play. As I said at the beginning of this thread, people are having issues with it, and that is why I'm against your idea/suggestion.asking more of, "hey try PR mumble edition out we use it" is not hard to do
That is very true. But it also makes playing PR a lot funnier.A.Wickens wrote:Lets also not brush over the immaturity that mumble sometimes seems to encourage.
Hell yeah! Many times I've chocked on air due to some mumble jokes!saXoni wrote:That is very true. But it also makes playing PR a lot funnier.
Exactly. Mumble makes PR a hundred times funnier. And better, of course.goguapsy wrote:Hell yeah! Many times I've chocked on air due to some mumble jokes!
I'm against you liking that sample of a woman.saXoni wrote:Smooth, I never said you asked for it in any wrong way. All I said (for the third time, now) was that I'm against your opinion, and since this is a forum, I can share my own opinions no matter what.
You're saying I don't have to be against it. Sure I don't. But guess what? I am.
What? Are you talking about my dear Katy?Arcturus_Shielder wrote:I'm against you liking that sample of a woman.
Could you please give a short list of the bad things about mumble?saXoni wrote:...
I just dont get people with girl usernames/pics/sigs lol, for example I thought AnimalMother was a girlsaXoni wrote:What? Are you talking about my dear Katy?