Page 4 of 4

Re: "Is it really Jabal without a dam?"

Posted: 2012-03-28 12:30
by ytman
I like it.

I assume that would also remove the North Bridge as well(as the entire river will move), which, while saddening, is a good idea gameplay wise. I also assume that would result in the West Mountain being more exagerated instead of a soft 'bump' which would give the MEC some more help.

One more, off topic, thing. Can you address the lower South East Mountain? That'd be an awesome PoI... especially if you could contrive an 'underground' part.

Re: "Is it really Jabal without a dam?"

Posted: 2012-03-31 08:59
by Fonsseals
That looks great. But the MEC main should be moved more NE or do something with the terrain so it can't be baseraped.

Re: "Is it really Jabal without a dam?"

Posted: 2012-03-31 19:57
by KaizerSosa81
At first I was a bit taken back when I first read the thread title as I wouldn't want to see the iconic dam go, but adjusting the map to become less static and more interesting while retaining the dam would be excellent.

Go for it I say...

Re: "Is it really Jabal without a dam?"

Posted: 2012-04-01 04:38
by Meza82
it depends on what ways the gamepley will be changed. how will it affect heavy assets or inf? i would like to see the removal of the dam on Jabal map just to change things up a bit, add replay value

Re: "Is it really Jabal without a dam?"

Posted: 2012-04-01 04:44
by Meza82
Tarranauha200 wrote:Activate da dam and make it first PR map with ship/boat combat!
there's boat combat on other maps like Kokan.

Re: "Is it really Jabal without a dam?"

Posted: 2012-04-01 10:24
by Mellanbror
Blow the damn dam =)

The times they are a'changing...

Re: "Is it really Jabal without a dam?"

Posted: 2012-04-02 13:30
by Hfett
Jabal without a Dam is like Muttrah without a city

Re: "Is it really Jabal without a dam?"

Posted: 2012-04-02 14:50
by Stealthgato
An alternative layer with heavier assets would be nice.