Project Reality Forums

It is our starting map so it's possible that it was just running rotation for a while

Had a player called Make_PR_Great_Again on the server today. He kept asking the APC squad if they were Korean, and eventually hatter them point blank(100% intentional), said "North Korea best Korea" and started spamming our mumble.

Despite multiple reports, he only got kicked. Bit disappointed with that.

A good server with active admins and loads of insurgency.

By_Zaca wrote:WOW, 35 hours... World record ? Finally one server in NA_EAST without lag/rubber-banding.

The only issue its about Fallujah. In 16 hours, i saw the server running Fallujah 5 times.

Yeah, I love the server but I'm sick of having Muttrah/Fallujah/Kokan every 2 maps.
Try voting for something different, guys.

You statement is 1/3 True.
Fallujah is our seeding map so yeah it's overplayed.
If you want proof look our BR, you can literally see the map rotation there =]H[= Battle Recorder



Edit: Don't want to double post...

Server will be down for a few days, fixing stuff

Really dislike the 2 INS 2 AAS policy. Especially when server is starting on INS i have no interest seeding it knowing next one will be INS again. How about 3 AAS 1 INS? Or 4 AAS 0 INS?

Going to make it 2INS/1CNC then!

Majority of the time (Not sure if others do it when I'm not there), during Fallujah we do a INS AAS mvote, to make people that dislike INS happy.

INS is a good seeding gamemode, less likely going to get a steam roll during low population time.

building on what max said changing the policy kind of negates the purpose of keeping it fair. too much ins in a row or too much AAS in a row both aren't fun. And it doesn't help that a lot of the fun AAS maps are huge so they are poor for seeding or keeping the server populated in general. Plus having 2 of each game mode ensures no one plays the same side twice in a row. Trying to keep things balanced and too much of one thing gets stale really fast. As for right now the only reason Fallujah ins is first is because historically it is the best seeding map on our server. Whether we change it to skirmish or just make sure theres a vote for what gamemode starts the rotation that we can do.

Not ripping on the server or the admins, i like the map list and i like the stability, but the players as of late have been taxing my very soul.

I was on H today and all i could hear was the twang of american voices, ball washing each other and patting themselves on the back and pontificating about their own importance. Fucking makes me ill.

Why don't you silly tards have some manners and shut up and listen for a change. gobshites.

edit: Que the typical response for those who cant come up with something more original " if you dont like it play somewhere else" Spoken like a true ultra-feminized mommy.


- user infracted for attitude problem -

Thanks for playing on the server. I understand your point, but isn't it better than Euros sucking each other's dicks, amirite? Haha, kidding.

Maybe it's just a cultural difference and you were triggered? Not really sure what you're getting at.

PricelineNegotiator wrote:Maybe it's just a cultural difference and you were triggered? Not really sure what you're getting at.

I mean, part of me sympathises with Psyko being a eurotwat, but yeah, this.

I think Psyko has a point here. I'm not stating that he's lying as I wasn't there, but my experiences with US servers has been quite bad in terms of player base. And I totally see some of them patting themselves on their own shoulders because the standard of gameplay that some of these people can easily adapt and understand sometimes is so low that there really is no "PR gameplay", only some semi-organized multiplayer random gunfights that probably seem awesome (or are forced as "awesome" by "crowd psychology", squad mates) just because the players are probably new to the game.

Don't get me wrong. It's not about Europeans vs Americans, but rather about the standards. That's why I just can't play in US servers no more. 3-4 Years ago I remember having a blast in H, but right now I'll better wait until an EU server fills up. And I'm really used to playing with Americans on EU servers lately (of whom most agree with me about the fact that EU servers are "better" in this context).

EU servers has their own cancerous population, but at least most of them feel that they know what's going on / have a game sense.

P.S.
Sorry for the offtopic. My comment isn't about this particular server, I just wanted to elaborate what my gay friend Psyko said. Because you seem to have misunderstood him.

I get what people are saying but its not really an issue you can fix by just kicking people. The real issue stems from a large influx of basically brand new players that never learned how to play PR well. There is also always a group of players that thinks the game is supposed to be a milsim and ends up getting nothing done. So everyone is entitled to their opinion but im not going to start turning players away because I don't like their playstyle unless they are legitimately breaking the rules its just not how a server should be run.

Had a nice round defending last flag on Grozny yesterday. This became even better when admins decided to play a third AAS map in a row. Hopefully this is first step away from your 2AAS/2INS policy

[R-DEV]Mats391 wrote:Had a nice round defending last flag on Grozny yesterday. This became even better when admins decided to play a third AAS map in a row. Hopefully this is first step away from your 2AAS/2INS policy

Just get over it, start playing INS. Or remove it from the game.

No

#AASisloveAASislife

Pronck wrote:Or remove it from the game.

Don't tempt him.

This is why I like you guys. Thank you for a proper response to all the criticism of your methods instead of removing the comments outlining an issue.

I can't believe I still remember my login, and I have voted accordingly. I only hope those players who are genuinely bothered by your current rotation vote as well.

Just played there, great server and great admins! Keep it up!